Embryogenesis 2012
DOI: 10.5772/37327
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genomic Integrity of Mouse Embryonic Stem Cells

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

3
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mutations in germ and stem cells are potentially more serious than those in other cells as they are passed to the cells’ progeny within the developing embryo or regenerating tissue ( 216 , 217 ). There is a presumed survival benefit when stem cells tend to show a particularly stringent maintenance of genome integrity through cell cycle regulation and enhanced responses to DNA damage ( 218 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mutations in germ and stem cells are potentially more serious than those in other cells as they are passed to the cells’ progeny within the developing embryo or regenerating tissue ( 216 , 217 ). There is a presumed survival benefit when stem cells tend to show a particularly stringent maintenance of genome integrity through cell cycle regulation and enhanced responses to DNA damage ( 218 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, comparing 2D and 3D models, differences were reported in toxicity induced by single‐walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNT) , while for silica NPs a distinct genotoxic response was shown in both models . In vitro stem cell differentiation seems to be an adequate model as they allow simultaneous assessment of these different parameters . Moreover, as in this cell model, the effects will depend on the proportion of heterogeneity of the cell type within the cell populations studied; the cell type and kinetics are of critical importance.…”
Section: Future Perspectives In Nano‐genotoxicologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mutation frequencies are generally much lower in stem cells compared with somatic cells, for example, 100-1000 times lower in mouse embryonic stem cells compared with embryonic fibroblasts (204). This more stringent maintenance of genomic integrity in stem cells is the consequence of differences in cell cycle regulation and increased DNA repair capacity (205). Besides differences in cell cycle checkpoints and repair, two other ways to deal with DNA damage for embryonic stem cells are the induction of apoptosis or the process of differentiation in order to avoid passing mutations to their progeny.…”
Section: Stem Cellsmentioning
confidence: 99%