The effect that monodisperse amorphous spherical silica particles of different sizes have on the viability of endothelial cells (EAHY926 cell line) is investigated. The results indicate that exposure to silica nanoparticles causes cytotoxic damage (as indicated by lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) release) and a decrease in cell survival (as determined by the tetrazolium reduction, MTT, assay) in the EAHY926 cell line in a dose-related manner. Concentrations leading to a 50% reduction in cell viability (TC(50)) for the smallest particles tested (14-, 15-, and 16-nm diameter) ranging from 33 to 47 microg cm(-2) of cell culture differ significantly from values assessed for the bigger nanoparticles: 89 and 254 microg cm(-2) (diameter of 19 and 60 nm, respectively). Two fine silica particles with diameters of 104 and 335 nm show very low cytotoxic response compared to nanometer-sized particles with TC(50) values of 1095 and 1087 microg cm(-2), respectively. The smaller particles also appear to affect the exposed cells faster with cell death (by necrosis) being observed within just a few hours. The surface area of the tested particles is an important parameter in determining the toxicity of monodisperse amorphous silica nanoparticles.

SummaryLow-dose exposures to common environmental chemicals that are deemed safe individually may be combining to instigate carcinogenesis, thereby contributing to the incidence of cancer. This risk may be overlooked by current regulatory practices and needs to be vigorously investigated.

Because of their small size and large specific surface area (SA), insoluble nanoparticles are almost not affected by the gravitational force and are generally formulated in stable suspensions or sols. This raises, however, a potential difficulty in in vitro assay systems in which cells adhering to the bottom of a culture vessel may not be exposed to the majority of nanoparticles in suspension. J. G. Teeguarden et al., 2007, Toxicol. Sci. 95, 300-312 have recently addressed this issue theoretically, emphasizing the need to characterize the effective dose (mass or number or SA dose of particles that affect the cells) which, according to their model based on sedimentation and gravitation forces, might only represent a very small fraction of the nominal dose. We hypothesized, in contrast, that because of convection forces that usually develop in sols, the majority of the particles may reach the target cells and exert their potential toxicity. To address this issue, we exposed three different cell lines (A549 epithelial cells, EAHY926 endothelial cells, and J774 monocyte-macrophages) to a monodisperse suspension of Stöber silica nanoparticles (SNP) in three different laboratories. Four different end points (lacticodehydrogenase [LDH] release, LDH cell content, tetrazolium salt (MTT), and crystal violet staining) were used to assess the cell response to nanoparticles. We found, in all cell lines and for all end points, that the cellular response was determined by the total mass/number/SA of particles as well as their concentration. Practically, for a given volume of dispersion, both parameters are of course intimately interdependent. We conclude that the nominal dose remains the most appropriate metric for in vitro toxicity testing of insoluble SNP dispersed in aqueous medium. This observation has important bearings on the experimental design and the interpretation of in vitro toxicological studies with nanoparticles.

No abstract

No abstract