2008
DOI: 10.1080/17435390802464986
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genotoxicity of engineered nanomaterials: A critical review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
144
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 227 publications
(146 citation statements)
references
References 90 publications
0
144
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It is already known that nanomaterials induce genotoxicity for 2 main reasons: ROS generation, which is caused by the high atom-to-surface ratio, and mechanical interference with cellular components, such as the nucleosome, microtubules, actin filament, and centrosome. 46,51,53 The ROS are also known to be involved in diverse physiological processes, including cell growth and differentiation, senescence, and cell death in various cell types, including prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells. 54 Plus, ROS give rise to various genotoxicities, including DNA damage, gene mutation, MN formation, and chromosome aberrations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is already known that nanomaterials induce genotoxicity for 2 main reasons: ROS generation, which is caused by the high atom-to-surface ratio, and mechanical interference with cellular components, such as the nucleosome, microtubules, actin filament, and centrosome. 46,51,53 The ROS are also known to be involved in diverse physiological processes, including cell growth and differentiation, senescence, and cell death in various cell types, including prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells. 54 Plus, ROS give rise to various genotoxicities, including DNA damage, gene mutation, MN formation, and chromosome aberrations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…51 Therefore, the genotoxic effect of MWCNT treatment was investigated using a comet assay and MN assay. Until now, no genotoxicity studies have investigated the impact of MWCNT treatment on normal HPBLs, although SWCNTs are known to induce genotoxicity in HPBLs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some researchers have examined the effects of free radicals on ENP genotoxicity [93], whereas others have discussed the impact of ion shedding on cytotoxicity [60,94,95].…”
Section: Between Each Factor (Level-3 Classifi Cation)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Engineered nanoparticles are known to posses major genotoxic effects such as interaction with DNA and non DNA targets, their interaction with components associated with cell growth cycle such as centromeres, cytoskeleton, microtubules etc induce polyploidy and aneugenic events during cell division. Some of the other possible effects of nanoparticles include Metal release, desorption of organic components, interaction with SH groups and Zn fingers of key proteins, saturation of metallothionein, changes in DNA methylation, secondary genotoxic effects through inflammation and activation of leukocytes, HIF stabilization through hypoxia-like effects, apoptosis/ necrosis and inhibition of key receptors/enzymes [49]. Although, various above discussed limitations and unforeseen problems that can arise from nanotechnology and its applications in medicine, its derivative technologies have a promising impact to solve more problems than they will create.…”
Section: Limitations Of Nanotechnologymentioning
confidence: 99%