2017
DOI: 10.1007/s00122-017-2917-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genomic prediction ability for yield-related traits in German winter barley elite material

Abstract: Genomic prediction was evaluated in German winter barley breeding lines. In this material, prediction ability is strongly influenced by population structure and main determinant of prediction ability is the close genetic relatedness of the breeding material. To ensure breeding progress under changing environmental conditions the implementation and evaluation of new breeding methods is of crucial importance. Modern breeding approaches like genomic selection may significantly accelerate breeding progress. We ass… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
35
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
13
35
1
Order By: Relevance
“…[50] obtained accuracies ranging from 0.40 to 0.83. Similarly, Thorwarth et al [51] found that the prediction accuracy differed substantially between traits and that yield and thousand-kernel weight and heading date were among those showing the highest accuracy (0.74 to 0.83) very similar to results obtained in the current study. Finally, for DON content, Lorenz et al [52] reported an accuracy of 0.37 (without correction for heritability), somewhat lower but similar to the value obtained here (0.5).…”
Section: Genomic Selection Accuracysupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[50] obtained accuracies ranging from 0.40 to 0.83. Similarly, Thorwarth et al [51] found that the prediction accuracy differed substantially between traits and that yield and thousand-kernel weight and heading date were among those showing the highest accuracy (0.74 to 0.83) very similar to results obtained in the current study. Finally, for DON content, Lorenz et al [52] reported an accuracy of 0.37 (without correction for heritability), somewhat lower but similar to the value obtained here (0.5).…”
Section: Genomic Selection Accuracysupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Similar results were found by Sallam and Smith [10], with GS accuracies ranging from 0.19 to 0.43 for yield and from 0.25 to 0.75 for DON concentration (prior to correcting for heritability). Thorwarth et al[51] evaluated the accuracy of prediction within families generated by intercrossing parents from old and modern cultivars. Similar to our results, they found that TKW showed the highest (0.71) prediction accuracy, while GYD exhibited the lowest value (0.31).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results indicate that GS will not be advantageous over pedigree-based selections in the EYT stage, given the family structure in these nurseries, highlighting the importance of implementing GS at the appropriate stage in the breeding program, where there is sufficient Mendelian sampling variation between the sibs. Nevertheless, predictions in populations with full-sibs in the training population compared to populations with only one progeny per cross, resulted in 24–321% increase in accuracies, clearly implying that genetic relatedness between the training and validation populations is crucial for good predictions as also reported in previous studies (Habier et al 2010; Clark et al 2012; Pszczola et al 2012; Thorwarth et al 2017). …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…Barley is the fourth most important cereal crop worldwide with an annual production of more than 143 million tons and is mainly used for animal feed and malting (FAOSTAT, 2019). Therefore, barley breeding efforts have focused mainly on grain yield and malting quality traits (Thorwarth et al, 2017). However, the collection of phenotypic data such as malting quality traits in large-scale breeding programs is expensive and time-consuming.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%