DOI: 10.14264/uql.2018.473
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genomic studies of biochemical compounds determining arabica coffee (Coffea arabica L.) quality

Abstract: Coffee is an important crop globally. Improving coffee quality is a primary breeding target that would benefit from understanding of trait inheritance and ancestral genetic information. However, comparatively little information exists on the genetics of quality and the relationships between wild and cultivated coffee genotypes, especially arabica coffee (Coffea arabica L.) which accounts for almost 60% of coffee production globally. The complex polyploidy genome and limited genomic information for C. arabica h… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 282 publications
(528 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This low level of genetic diversity can be attributed to two reasons. First, due to its recent origins, limited geographical distribution and self-fertilisation, C. arabica accessions generally contain fewer polymorphic sites compared to the more diverse C. canephora accessions [6,25,57,59]. The intraspecific breeding between a low number of plants that were initially distributed worldwide was reported as the source of low polymorphism for C. arabica [2,55,60,61].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This low level of genetic diversity can be attributed to two reasons. First, due to its recent origins, limited geographical distribution and self-fertilisation, C. arabica accessions generally contain fewer polymorphic sites compared to the more diverse C. canephora accessions [6,25,57,59]. The intraspecific breeding between a low number of plants that were initially distributed worldwide was reported as the source of low polymorphism for C. arabica [2,55,60,61].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%