2009
DOI: 10.1007/bf03256346
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genotyping of CYP21A2 for Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia Screening using Allele-Specific Primer Extension followed by Bead Array Hybridization

Abstract: A novel CAH mutation screening method has been developed to detect ten point mutations and the 8 bp deletion in CYP21A2, as well as large deletions between CYP21A1P and CYP21A2. This novel genotyping strategy is superior to PCR-RFLP-based methods and equally as accurate as sequencing.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The importance of determining what nucleotide positions are specific to either CYP21A2 or the pseudogene is underscored by the variation that was seen in the normal population controls at nucleotide positions c.*440C > T and c.*443T > C. Differences in the reference sequences for these sites in CYP21A2 ( C GC T ) and CYP21A1P ( T GC C) have been utilized as the basis of locus-specific PCR amplification in multiple studies as well as determining the CYP21A2 copy number analysis by MLPA [6], [17], [21], [23], [37], [39], [40]. In the normal population controls characterized in this study, 15/60 individuals had aberrant PCR profiles for the CYP21A2, CYP21A1P, 30 kb deletion and large scale conversion amplifications when using locus specific primers to this site.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The importance of determining what nucleotide positions are specific to either CYP21A2 or the pseudogene is underscored by the variation that was seen in the normal population controls at nucleotide positions c.*440C > T and c.*443T > C. Differences in the reference sequences for these sites in CYP21A2 ( C GC T ) and CYP21A1P ( T GC C) have been utilized as the basis of locus-specific PCR amplification in multiple studies as well as determining the CYP21A2 copy number analysis by MLPA [6], [17], [21], [23], [37], [39], [40]. In the normal population controls characterized in this study, 15/60 individuals had aberrant PCR profiles for the CYP21A2, CYP21A1P, 30 kb deletion and large scale conversion amplifications when using locus specific primers to this site.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the dependency on the use of clinically relevant mutations for PCR specificity will lead to additional false positives and complicated genotypic analysis. Several methods for mutation analysis of CYP21A2, including allele specific PCR, primer extension and oligo ligation assays [17], [18], [20], [23], [38], [41], [42], [43], [44] are based upon either the Exon 10 3′ UTR region, or the Exons 3 and 6 mutations, raising the question of analytical specificity for these CYP21A2 mutation screening approaches. The single long-range PCR amplification method described in this study overcomes this lack of specificity in the 3′UTR region by exploiting the deletion region in the TNXA and TNXB genes downstream of CYP21A1P and CYP21A2 and also simplifies downstream analysis because it is not dependent on what mutations may be present in the CYP21A2 gene.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation