2019
DOI: 10.1007/s12517-019-4601-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geochemical characteristics of the karst-type bauxites: an example from the Kanirash deposit, NW Iran

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Jiujialu Formation, which shows parallel unconformities with the overlying lower Carboniferous limestone/clay rock and the underlying Cambrian or Ordovician dolomite strata, usually comprises a 1–20 m thick bauxite bed (bauxite ore/clay rock) and an underlying 0–6 m thick iron bed (iron ore/iron‐rich clay) (Figure 2). This typical “iron‐bauxite” structure is widespread worldwide, such as the Ghiona bauxite deposit in Greece (Kalaitzidis et al., 2010), the Nurra bauxite deposit in Italy (Mameli et al., 2007), the Kanisheeteh, Kanirash, Shahindezh, Qopi, Darzi‐Vali; Soleiman‐Kandi, Kani‐Zarrineh bauxite deposits in Iran (Abedini, Habibi Mehr, et al., 2019; Abedini et al., 2019a, 2019b; Abedini et al., 2022a, 2022b; Calagari & Abedini, 2007; Khosravi et al., 2017, 2021), and most bauxite deposits in China (e.g., Ling et al., 2017; X. Liu et al., 2017; Yu et al., 2019; Z. Zhang et al., 2013). In central Guizhou, the thickness of the Jiujialu Formation is controlled by the paleo‐karst unconformities, that is, the thickness above the karst depression is greater than that above the highland (Figure 3).…”
Section: Geological Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Jiujialu Formation, which shows parallel unconformities with the overlying lower Carboniferous limestone/clay rock and the underlying Cambrian or Ordovician dolomite strata, usually comprises a 1–20 m thick bauxite bed (bauxite ore/clay rock) and an underlying 0–6 m thick iron bed (iron ore/iron‐rich clay) (Figure 2). This typical “iron‐bauxite” structure is widespread worldwide, such as the Ghiona bauxite deposit in Greece (Kalaitzidis et al., 2010), the Nurra bauxite deposit in Italy (Mameli et al., 2007), the Kanisheeteh, Kanirash, Shahindezh, Qopi, Darzi‐Vali; Soleiman‐Kandi, Kani‐Zarrineh bauxite deposits in Iran (Abedini, Habibi Mehr, et al., 2019; Abedini et al., 2019a, 2019b; Abedini et al., 2022a, 2022b; Calagari & Abedini, 2007; Khosravi et al., 2017, 2021), and most bauxite deposits in China (e.g., Ling et al., 2017; X. Liu et al., 2017; Yu et al., 2019; Z. Zhang et al., 2013). In central Guizhou, the thickness of the Jiujialu Formation is controlled by the paleo‐karst unconformities, that is, the thickness above the karst depression is greater than that above the highland (Figure 3).…”
Section: Geological Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, under higher oxygen fugacity, Eu 3+ dominates in the aqueous system and requires hard bases such as OH − , SO 4 2− and CO 3 2− (especially OH − ) to precipitate, as a result, negative Eu anomaly can be considered. In addition, Abedini et al (2019) suggested that the strong negative Eu anomaly may be associated with higher O 2 and lower pH of the solutions. Post-Archean Australian Shale (PAAS) =0.61 in the evaluation of Eu anomaly (Eu/Eu*); Post/ Archean upper continental crust (UCC)=0.66 is accepted as the post-Archean upper continental crust (Sinisi, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the high field strength elements (e.g., Nb, Zr) and TiO 2 are indicative of magmatic origin due to their immobile behavior during diagenesis and weathering (Berry, 1999;He et al, 2014;Hong et al, 2019Hong et al, , 2020. The Al 2 O 3 /TiO 2 ratio is generally considered a useful indicator of the provenance because the concentrations of Al and Ti in the materials remain constant during diagenesis and weathering (Nesbitt and Young, 1982;Sugitani, 1996;Abedini and Calagari, 2012;Abedini, 2017;Abedini and Calagari, 2017;Abedini et al, 2018;Abedini et al, 2019a;Abedini et al, 2019b;Abedini et al, 2020a;Abedini et al, 2020b;Kiaeshkevarian et al, 2020;Leontopoulou et al, 2021;Abedini and Khosravi, 2022). According to the classification model, the volcanic ashes corresponding to the bentonite deposits are classified as felsic magmas in all sections and in the fields of rhyolite (Figure 5).…”
Section: The Formation Process Of F-rich Bentonitesmentioning
confidence: 99%