1966
DOI: 10.2307/1441406
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geographical Distribution of Central American Freshwater Fishes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

21
212
0
17

Year Published

1997
1997
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 253 publications
(250 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
21
212
0
17
Order By: Relevance
“…It is of biogeographic note that the Usumacinta River ichthyofauna includes 18 species with marine ancestry. This river system drains an eroded carbonate and limestone karst formation (Miller, 1966;Myers, 1966;West et al, 1969) and uplift of this formation potentially created an isolated high ionic habitat permitting marine fish to gradually shift to freshwater tolerance.…”
Section: Vicariance and Dispersal Across The Ep/ea Biogeographic Trackmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is of biogeographic note that the Usumacinta River ichthyofauna includes 18 species with marine ancestry. This river system drains an eroded carbonate and limestone karst formation (Miller, 1966;Myers, 1966;West et al, 1969) and uplift of this formation potentially created an isolated high ionic habitat permitting marine fish to gradually shift to freshwater tolerance.…”
Section: Vicariance and Dispersal Across The Ep/ea Biogeographic Trackmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite recent gains toward understanding the biogeography of Central American freshwater fishes (Matamoros et al, 2012(Matamoros et al, , 2015, very little is known about the distribution and basic ecology of fishes in the small upland streams of the interior highlands (Miller, 1966, Lyons, 2005, Esselman et al, 2006. Livebearers (Poeciliidae) comprise a substantial portion of the Central American freshwater fish diversity, and are common in most aquatic habitats throughout the region (for example, Matamoros et al, 2009Matamoros et al, , 2012Matamoros et al, , 2015McMahan et al, 2013;Angulo et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the dispersion of freshwater fish and some other aquatics are strictly limited by hydrological barriers. Though many of them exhibit inter-watershed distribution caused by physiographic changes of land or occasional anastomosing of river systems during flood seasons throughout history (Loxterman and Keeley, 2012;Miller, 1966), they cannot naturally disperse across current hydrological barriers. Thus, it might be more appropriate to delineate distribution ranges of these taxa according to hydrological boundaries rather than predict them by using geographical variables in SDM.…”
Section: Imperfect But Practical Approaches Of Creating the Fish Distmentioning
confidence: 99%