1995
DOI: 10.1029/95gl00948
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geomagnetic transmission of solar energetic protons during the geomagnetic disturbances of October 1989

Abstract: We present orbit‐averaged geomagnetic transmission measurements during the large solar energetic particle events of October 1989 using proton data from the NOAA‐10 and GOES‐7 satellites. We compare the measurements to geomagnetic transmission calculations determined by tracing particle trajectories through the combination of the International Geomagnetic Reference Field (IGRF) model and the 1989 Tsyganenko magnetospheric magnetic field model. We modify the effective ‘ring current’ parameter in the 1989 Tsygane… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Tsyganenko (1989) magnetospheric field model describes the magnetospheric field topologies for Kp" magnetic indices from 0 to 5. The Boberg et al, (1995) extension was used to describe the magnetospheric fields for magnetic activity levels exceeding Kp values of 5. For convenience we have labeled these as Kp 6 through 10 in Dst^ increments of-100 nT.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Tsyganenko (1989) magnetospheric field model describes the magnetospheric field topologies for Kp" magnetic indices from 0 to 5. The Boberg et al, (1995) extension was used to describe the magnetospheric fields for magnetic activity levels exceeding Kp values of 5. For convenience we have labeled these as Kp 6 through 10 in Dst^ increments of-100 nT.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CL model of Smart et al (1999) used in DRAP (Sauer & Wilkinson 2008) was based on particle ray tracing through a Tsyganenko (1989) model of the magnetosphere parameterised by the K p index for K p = 0 to 5, and extended by Boberg et al (1995) for D st index values from 0 to À500 nT. Dmitriev et al (2010) determined the CL from proton flux measurements on the NASA Polar Orbiting Operational Environment Satellites (POES) fitting ellipses to the observed CL, parameterised by magnetic local time (MLT), the dipole tilt angle, and geomagnetic indices D st , K p and (in the case of energetic electrons) the AE index.…”
Section: Rigidity Cut-off Latitude Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We describe effects of the external-field model [11] and its extension with including Dst, according to [12], which is found to be relevant for neutron monitor measurements at high (Oulu) and a middle (LomnickýŠtít) latitude stations as well as for low-altitude satellites. We also test the stability of the trajectory and consequent cut-off computations vs. uncertainties of the magnetic-field models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%