2021
DOI: 10.1002/gdj3.120
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geoscience data publication: Practices and perspectives on enabling the FAIR guiding principles

Abstract: Over a century ago, the scientific research community first acknowledged the importance and value data hold beyond their original, intended use (Cajal, 1999). Geoscience data hold particular value, representing snapshots of Earth systems that are unique in both space and time, and as such are often irreplaceable. These data serve as records of the past and present, necessary to understand current, and predict future states, rates and processes of global systems. But the

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…15 While these principles are becoming more widely adopted, SRP collaborative projects identified many barriers to making data FAIR and to facilitating broader data integration and sharing throughout the entire data lifecycle. Their experiences reflect commonalities with other institutions and initiatives from across a variety of disciplines who have recognized the value of the FAIR principles and sought to implement themdiscovering and clarifying the associated barriers along the wayincluding immunology, 16 plant sciences, 17 medical research, 18 chemistry, 19 geosciences, 20 computational toxicology, 21,22 psychology, 23 genomics, 24 ecology, 25 and human disease. 26 Figure 1.…”
Section: ■ Why Fair?mentioning
confidence: 73%
“…15 While these principles are becoming more widely adopted, SRP collaborative projects identified many barriers to making data FAIR and to facilitating broader data integration and sharing throughout the entire data lifecycle. Their experiences reflect commonalities with other institutions and initiatives from across a variety of disciplines who have recognized the value of the FAIR principles and sought to implement themdiscovering and clarifying the associated barriers along the wayincluding immunology, 16 plant sciences, 17 medical research, 18 chemistry, 19 geosciences, 20 computational toxicology, 21,22 psychology, 23 genomics, 24 ecology, 25 and human disease. 26 Figure 1.…”
Section: ■ Why Fair?mentioning
confidence: 73%
“…This hinders data from being Open and/or Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable (FAIR; Wilkinson et al, 2016). Further, specific criteria to implement the FAIR Guiding Principles (Gries et al, 2019;Jones et al, 2019) inevitably vary across disciplines and data types as inconsistencies in interpretations of the principles have grown (e.g., Kinkade & Shepherd, 2021;Mons et al, 2017;Stall et al, 2019). Importantly, FAIR does not mean Open; data can be Open without being FAIR, and vice versa (see What is the difference between "FAIR data" and "Open data" if there is one?).…”
Section: Current Statusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The growing awareness of Findability, Accessibility, Interoperability, and Reusability (FAIR) data principles (https://www.go-fair.org/fair-principles/) i s a n acknowledgment of these truths within the broader scientific community [1]. However, consistent application of these principles is a scientific challenge of its own, and different disciplines have made more and less progress toward these important goals [2][3][4]. Several FAIR data principles work around ensuring data and metadata are properly developed using standard vocabularies, adequately archived, and open, which ensure that data can be easily found by a human or machine.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%