2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9671.2012.01303.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geospatial Information Integration for Authoritative and Crowd Sourced Road Vector Data

Abstract: This article describes results from a research project undertaken to explore the technical issues associated with integrating unstructured crowd sourced data with authoritative national mapping data. The ultimate objective is to develop methodologies to ensure the feature enrichment of authoritative data, using crowd sourced data. Users increasingly find that they wish to use data from both kinds of geographic data sources. Different techniques and methodologies can be developed to solve this problem. In our p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An official spatial dataset can be considerably different from a VGI dataset. The integration of VGI data (e.g., OpenStreetMap) and official data is an important issue for many applications such as data-description enrichment [7,8], data-quality enhancement [9], and data-change detections. However, the consistency of geographical ISPRS Int.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An official spatial dataset can be considerably different from a VGI dataset. The integration of VGI data (e.g., OpenStreetMap) and official data is an important issue for many applications such as data-description enrichment [7,8], data-quality enhancement [9], and data-change detections. However, the consistency of geographical ISPRS Int.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By using a semantic value and disregarding its representation, Fonseca [8] constructed geographic ontology for data integration. Du et al [9] In this paper, we mainly centered on the first step of geospatial data conflation-matching. The remainder of this paper is organized as follows: Section 2 presents related work regarding geospatial data integration and the corresponding objects matching in GIS; Section 3 presents the character of each attribute separately, describes the methodology to convey the similarity metric, and then describes the Entropy-Weighted Approach (EWA) we used to calculate the weights by the entropy of attributes; Section 4 presents experimental data, different models proposed based on EWA and an evaluation of our work; and Section 5 presents the conclusions of the study and discusses further work.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By using a semantic value and disregarding its representation, Fonseca [8] constructed geographic ontology for data integration. Du et al [9] converted geo-data sets to ontologies and merged these ontologies into a coherent ontology to integrate disparate geospatial road vector data. Zhu, et al [10] indicated that merging multi-source ontologies based on a concept lattice could reduce the redundancy among different concepts.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method has been used to evaluate the statistics of road network completeness in urban and rural areas based on the lengths of the matching line features. Besides the geometrical feature matching, another approach is to use the ontology-based methods (e.g., in [22]) for merging features from crowd-sourced and authoritative domains.…”
Section: Spatial Data Matching and Conflatingmentioning
confidence: 99%