1982
DOI: 10.3133/ofr82279
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geotechnical properties of ash deposits near Hilo, Hawaii

Abstract: Open-File Report 82-279This report is prelim!inary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey editorial standards and strati graphic nomenclature.Any use of trade names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the USGS. ABSTRACTTwo holes were hand augered and sampled in ash deposits near Hilo, Hawaii. Color, water content and sensitivity of the ash were measured in the field. The ash alternated between reddish brown and dark reddish brown in color and had wat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The slightly granular response agrees with a relatively high frictional resistance, larger than what would be expected for most temperate sedimentary clays with equivalent plasticity. Nonetheless, the friction angles in Table 2 are comparable to those obtained in previous studies of Hawaiian ash soils by Tuncer & Lohnes (1977) and Wieczorek et al (1982). The high plasticity of this soil, in its non-dried state, can obviously not be used to estimate its strength using classical relationships such as the one by Kenney (1959) and others.…”
Section: Strength Testssupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The slightly granular response agrees with a relatively high frictional resistance, larger than what would be expected for most temperate sedimentary clays with equivalent plasticity. Nonetheless, the friction angles in Table 2 are comparable to those obtained in previous studies of Hawaiian ash soils by Tuncer & Lohnes (1977) and Wieczorek et al (1982). The high plasticity of this soil, in its non-dried state, can obviously not be used to estimate its strength using classical relationships such as the one by Kenney (1959) and others.…”
Section: Strength Testssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…However, there was little evidence of the presence of these two minerals upon X-ray diffraction examination, as is discussed below. A complicating factor is that some of the Hilo area soils also have a significant organic content (Wieczorek et al, 1982), the drying of which is irreversible as well. In any case, all the soils in this study were kept moist at all times.…”
Section: Soils Testedmentioning
confidence: 99%