Gerontological nursing competencies: A crosswalk with the 4Ms framework of the age-friendly initiative

Johnson, Brenda P.; Dyck, Mary J.; Hovey, Susan; Shropshire, Michele

doi:10.1080/02701960.2021.1974430

Cited by 8 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 6 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…34 A crosswalk approach was also used to compare a nationwide age-friendly initiative, known as 4 M's (what matters, mentation, medication, mobility), with gerontologic nurse competencies. 35 The 4 M's were found to be aligned with the ANCC's gerontologic nursing certification examination competencies at 84% (16/19), baccalaureate competencies for older adults at 87% (13/15), and the Hartford Institute for Geriatric Nursing competencies at 100% (28/28).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 95%

“…For example, a crosswalk method was used to compare University of Texas 33 EBP competencies to CNS practice domains of expert practitioner, researcher, consultant, educator, and leader, identifying that all master's-level competencies aligned with CNS practice domains 34 . A crosswalk approach was also used to compare a nationwide age-friendly initiative, known as 4 M's (what matters, mentation, medication, mobility), with gerontologic nurse competencies 35 . The 4 M's were found to be aligned with the ANCC's gerontologic nursing certification examination competencies at 84% (16/19), baccalaureate competencies for older adults at 87% (13/15), and the Hartford Institute for Geriatric Nursing competencies at 100% (28/28).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

A Crosswalk Analysis Between Magnet® Standards and Clinical Nurse Specialist Practice Competencies

Fulton

Gilbert

Rader

et al. 2022

JONA: The Journal of Nursing Administration

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to determine the alignment between the American Nurses Credentialing Center's Magnet Recognition Program® standards and clinical nurse specialist (CNS) practice competencies. BACKGROUND Despite documentation of CNS contributions to achieving and sustaining Magnet Recognition®, there is a lack of evidence clearly aligning Magnet® standards and CNS practice competencies. METHODS Using a crosswalk method, an expert panel of CNSs and chief nursing executives analyzed alignment of the 50 Magnet standards with the 44 National Association of Clinical Nurse Specialists core practice competencies. RESULTS CNS practice competencies are aligned closely with Magnet standards: 86% of the 50 Magnet standards aligned with at least 1 CNS competency and 81.8% of CNS competencies aligned with at least 1 Magnet® standard. CONCLUSIONS The alignment between Magnet standards and CNS competencies supports evidence of CNS contributions to organizational achievement of Magnet Recognition and will assist nurse executives in identifying a full scope of opportunities for CNSs to contribute to nursing excellence.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 95%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Crosswalk Analysis Between Magnet® Standards and Clinical Nurse Specialist Practice Competencies

Fulton

Gilbert

Rader

et al. 2022

JONA: The Journal of Nursing Administration

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This study protocol contributes to the development of a nascent field of study examining how health and aged care services can become more age-friendly [ 18 , 19 , 42 , 43 ], with a specific emergent emphasis on the role of co-design in developing 4M approaches to health care for older adults [ 44 ]. Specifically, it contributes a rural, international perspective to these debates, which are primarily urban-centric and focused on care for older adults within North America [ 42 , 45 ]. It will achieve this by examining how the use of a 4Ms framework within a co-design process can facilitate or hinder the development of age-friendly integrated care models in a rural context.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluating the Co-design of an Age-Friendly, Rural, Multidisciplinary Primary Care Model: A Study Protocol

Winterton

Brasher²,

Ashcroft

2022

MPs

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In the context of increased rates of frailty and chronic disease among older people, there is a need to develop age-friendly, integrated primary care models that place the older person at the centre of their care. However, there is little evidence about how age-friendly integrated care frameworks that are sensitive to the challenges of rural regions can be developed. This protocol paper outlines a study that will examine how the use of an age-friendly care framework (the Indigo 4Ms Framework) within a co-design process can facilitate the development of models of integrated care for rural older people within the Upper Hume region (Victoria, Australia). A co-design team will be assembled, which will include older people and individuals from local health, aged care, and community organisations. Process and outcome evaluation of the co-design activities will be undertaken to determine (1) the processes, activities and outputs that facilitate or hinder the co-design of a 4Ms integrated approach, and (2) how the use of the Indigo 4Ms Framework within a co-design process contributes to more integrated working practices. This protocol contributes to the development of a field of study examining how rural health and aged care services can become more age-friendly, with an emphasis on the role of co-design in developing integrated approaches to health care for older adults.

show abstract

“…The World Health Organization, John A. Hartford Foundation, Institute for Healthcare Improvement (HI), American Hospital Association, and numerous others have envisioned age friendly cities, communities and health systems. 1 , 2 , 3 This call has resonated in a variety of interdisciplinary contexts including education, 4 nursing, 5 pharmacy, 6 audiology 7 and oncology. 8 , 9 Age‐friendly health care has also spanned the continuum of care in ambulatory, 10 emergency department, 11 hospital, 12 “minute clinic”, 13 and even rural settings.…”

Section: Introduction: Minding the Gap–4 M And Social Determinant Com...mentioning

confidence: 99%

An age‐friendly population health dashboard geolocating by clinical and social determinant needs

Hashmi

Christy

Saxena

et al. 2022

Health Services Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The call for age friendliness has been championed by numerous organizations. The World Health Organization, John A. Hartford Foundation, Institute for Healthcare Improvement (HI), American Hospital Association, and numerous others have envisioned age friendly cities, communities and health systems. [1][2][3] This call has resonated in a variety of interdisciplinary contexts including education, 4 nursing, 5 pharmacy, 6 audiology 7 and oncology. 8,9 Age-friendly health care has An electronic Age Friendly 4 M population health dashboard ("AF4MD") was designed as follows: The target population consisted of community dwelling older adults with primary residence in Ohio,

show abstract

Gerontological nursing competencies: A crosswalk with the 4Ms framework of the age-friendly initiative

Cited by 8 publications

References 6 publications

A Crosswalk Analysis Between Magnet® Standards and Clinical Nurse Specialist Practice Competencies

A Crosswalk Analysis Between Magnet® Standards and Clinical Nurse Specialist Practice Competencies

Evaluating the Co-design of an Age-Friendly, Rural, Multidisciplinary Primary Care Model: A Study Protocol

An age‐friendly population health dashboard geolocating by clinical and social determinant needs

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About