2017
DOI: 10.1007/s11740-017-0763-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Getting to grips with automated prepreg handling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, UDs and NCFs have more freedom in tailoring the lay-up sequence. However, UDs will have the tendency to split, tear and wrinkle under forming loads due to their low structural rigidity [4,20]. Additional advantages of NCFs include an increase in the layup rate due to higher masses per-unit area and a low number of defects due to material handlingeven in large cut pieces [21].…”
Section: Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Also, UDs and NCFs have more freedom in tailoring the lay-up sequence. However, UDs will have the tendency to split, tear and wrinkle under forming loads due to their low structural rigidity [4,20]. Additional advantages of NCFs include an increase in the layup rate due to higher masses per-unit area and a low number of defects due to material handlingeven in large cut pieces [21].…”
Section: Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Plies are generally picked up straight and placed straight down, e.g. [4,[40][41][42]. Alternatively, pick-up and place down is achieved through a rolling motion [22].…”
Section: Ply Handling Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations