Giant resonance in the total photoabsorption cross section of Z ≈ 90 nuclei

Large-scale QRPA calculation of E1-strength and its impact on the neutron capture cross section

“…4), 239 Pu and 241 Pu. This recommended inversion, though not clearly observed in the 1976 experimental data of [35] illustrated in Fig. 4, is predicted by our QRPA calculation with the above-mentionned correction for deformed nuclei.…”

Few-neutron removal from238U at relativistic energies

“…5 shows for 950 A MeV incident energy the differential electromagnetic excitation cross sections for GDR, GQR, and DGDR excitations as calculated with the Lorentzian parameters listed in Table 3 for the different multipolarities, and by assuming a harmonic model for the DGDR. It should be noted that the Lorentzian parameters for the GDR in 238U determined by the experiments with real photons [21,22,23] differ among each other. We have chosen to use the parameters of the most recent experiment [23], but will discuss the consequences of another choice below.…”

Constraining the calculation of U234,236,238(n,γ) cross sections with measurements of the Ullmann1, Kawano2, Baramsai3 et al. 2017Phys. Rev. C

“…To do this, the NLD, M1 and E2 PSF parameters were kept fixed at those from the CoH 3 parameterization. Simulations were made for 237,239 U compound nuclei using the GLO model for the E1 PSF with parameters for 236,238 U from Veyssiere [43], Gurevich [44], and Dietrich [29], as well as the CoH 3 values shown in Table II. The calculated Γ γ values ranged from 22 to 26 meV.…”