2017
DOI: 10.1111/jcmm.13429
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

GIMDA: Graphlet interaction‐based MiRNA‐disease association prediction

Abstract: MicroRNAs (miRNAs) have been confirmed to be closely related to various human complex diseases by many experimental studies. It is necessary and valuable to develop powerful and effective computational models to predict potential associations between miRNAs and diseases. In this work, we presented a prediction model of Graphlet Interaction for MiRNA‐Disease Association prediction (GIMDA) by integrating the disease semantic similarity, miRNA functional similarity, Gaussian interaction profile kernel similarity … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
(117 reference statements)
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From above formula 3, it is easy to see that the diseases in the same layer of DAG(D) will make the same contribution to the semantic value of D. Moreover, for diseases in the same layer of DAG(D), it is reasonable to assume that the diseases appeared in less DAGs will be more specific than those diseases appeared in more DAGs (Chen et al, 2018a). Hence, in order to protrude the contribution of these more specific diseases, the contribution of the node d in T(D) to the semantic value of the disease D could be obtained according to the following formula as well (Chen et al, 2015):…”
Section: Disease Semantic Similarity Model Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From above formula 3, it is easy to see that the diseases in the same layer of DAG(D) will make the same contribution to the semantic value of D. Moreover, for diseases in the same layer of DAG(D), it is reasonable to assume that the diseases appeared in less DAGs will be more specific than those diseases appeared in more DAGs (Chen et al, 2018a). Hence, in order to protrude the contribution of these more specific diseases, the contribution of the node d in T(D) to the semantic value of the disease D could be obtained according to the following formula as well (Chen et al, 2015):…”
Section: Disease Semantic Similarity Model Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chen et al devised a method GIMDA based on graphlet interaction which was applied to analyse the relevance between two points. 28 The AUCs of GIMDA in global, local LOOCV and 5-fold cross validation turned out to be 0.9006 and 0.8455 and 0.8927 respectively. However, as NTSMDA and GIMDA strongly depends on network topological structure, they cannot be applied to diseases without any known associated miR- work distance to predict miRNA-disease associations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Chen et al. devised a method GIMDA based on graphlet interaction which was applied to analyse the relevance between two points . The AUCs of GIMDA in global, local LOOCV and 5‐fold cross validation turned out to be 0.9006 and 0.8455 and 0.8927 respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experimental results demonstrate that LRSSLMDA is a valuable computational model. In addition, many previous methods are based on machine learning algorithms [29, 30], matrix completion [3133] and graph theory [34]. For example, Shen et al [35] proposed CMFMDA that uses WKNKN to estimate association probability for unknown associations between miRNA and disease, and uses Collaborative Matrix Factorization to uncover the potential association.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%