At the time of writing this editorial, we are in the middle of a global crisis because of the coronavirus -this is a very special and serious situation. Due to the coronavirus, we are being told to avoid human contact and physical face-to-face meetings as much as possible, and to stay in our homes. In many ways, such incidents of such epidemics have ontological implications since they have a severe impact on our basic need for human contact and other human aspects of life, as well as our basic view of being in the world. In such situations, it is of course of greatest importance to protect the health of all of us and to show solidarity, and we have all a collective responsibility to do this.At the same time, life must go on, and for the coming weeks and months we are being told to perform our teaching and research from our homes since schools and universities are closed; pupils and student must study from home, and so in these circumstances digital tools and remote teaching will have to be applied. This will be a new situation for the majority of us and in many ways we can see that digital technology can help us, making it possible to keep pupils and students involved in learning, even in a global crisis such as this. But this disruptive situation requires us also to reconsider "how teachers teach and students learn" as distance learning, virtual learning and remote teaching dominate in the following weeks and months. This implies that we keep in mind the pro and the cons of physical face-to-face meetings versus virtual meetings, which in many ways have ontological aspects we should be aware of. Emmanuel Lévinas states that physical face-to-face meetings have strong ethical aspects grounded in human nature, which calls for empathy, human touch and understanding (Morgan 2011). The sociologist Zygmunt Bauman (2007) has followed up the ethics of Lévinas, also taking the physical face-to-face meeting as his point of departure. Bauman is particularly concerned about social structures that do away with "face meetings", only to be replaced by virtual communication through social media (in addition to being anonymous). Nevertheless, with this awareness in mind, the coronavirus situation calls for immediate action and we might say that this adds a new layer to our perception of physical face-to-face meetings versus virtual meetings, where we are now not only forbidden from having physical contact (with anyone other than immediate family), but also have to deal with it as best we can in this global crisis.And since this very special situation obviously has ontological implications, now might be the right time to take an ontological and epistemological step back regarding the pro and the cons of educational technology on a more general basis. We might ask ourselves how we per-