1993
DOI: 10.1038/363234a0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Global climate change and terrestrial net primary production

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

28
1,016
8
17

Year Published

2002
2002
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,753 publications
(1,069 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
28
1,016
8
17
Order By: Relevance
“…This is a small flux relative to the global annual NPP of 40-78 Pg C (Melillo et al, 1993) but is significant relative to the annual carbon emission from fossil fuel and cement production (about 6 Pg in 1990), the atmospheric increase in CO 2 abundance (3.3 Pg C) and the ''missing sink'' (1.8 Pg C) that represents the imbalance of the known terms (Malhi et al, 1999). Given the large uncertainties associated with the individual terms estimated by models of global terrestrial carbon fluxes (e.g., leaf, above-ground wood, root, and heterotrophic respiration), the addition of another uncertain term, RCC emissions from vegetation, may not improve the accuracy of global estimates of carbon fluxes in the near future.…”
Section: Global Carbon Cyclementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is a small flux relative to the global annual NPP of 40-78 Pg C (Melillo et al, 1993) but is significant relative to the annual carbon emission from fossil fuel and cement production (about 6 Pg in 1990), the atmospheric increase in CO 2 abundance (3.3 Pg C) and the ''missing sink'' (1.8 Pg C) that represents the imbalance of the known terms (Malhi et al, 1999). Given the large uncertainties associated with the individual terms estimated by models of global terrestrial carbon fluxes (e.g., leaf, above-ground wood, root, and heterotrophic respiration), the addition of another uncertain term, RCC emissions from vegetation, may not improve the accuracy of global estimates of carbon fluxes in the near future.…”
Section: Global Carbon Cyclementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The gauged discharge data used were collated by the Global Runoff Data Centre (GRDC) from 1348 gauging stations with tributaries larger than 2500 km 2 and with time series exceeding 12 years with < 10% missing data. The water balance model uses the data set of Legates and Willmott (1990a) for global precipitation, the formula of Hamon (1963) to calculate evapotranspiration on the basis of temperature (using the data set of Legates and Willmott, 1990b), soil type data from the FAO/UNESCO soil data bank (FAO/UNESCO, 1986), topographic data from the ETOPO5 global elevation data set (Edwards, 1989) and a contemporary land cover classification derived from the Terrestrial Ecosystem Model (Melillo et al, 1993) with Olson's land use classification (Olson, 1991).…”
Section: Hydrological Data 221 Runoff Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model takes into consideration how land carbon dynamics are influenced by multiple environmental factors, both static ones such as soil texture and elevation, and dynamic ones such as CO 2 fertilization, climate change and variability, land-use change, and ozone pollution (Melillo et al 1993(Melillo et al , 2009McGuire et al 2001;Tian et al 2003;Felzer et al 2005). In this study, carbon dynamics are simulated for a mosaic of land-cover cohorts contained within each 0.5°latitude by 0.5°longitude grid cell.…”
Section: The Terrestrial Ecosystem Model (Tem)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The legacy of past land-use change is considered in our study by using a disturbance cohort approach (Reilly et al 2012) to track the effects of land-use change and climate on terrestrial carbon stocks and fluxes from 1700 to 2005. Starting from the potential vegetation map (Melillo et al 1993), cohorts within each half-degree grid cell are created or modified (divided) from 1700 to 2005 according to the timing and location of land conversions as derived from the annual land-use transition data of Hurtt et al (2006Hurtt et al ( , 2011.…”
Section: Land-use/land-cover History Reconstructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation