Global psychology: a bibliometric analysis of Web of Science publications

Cortés, José Luis; Fernández-López, Juan Antonio; López-Baena, Alfonso; Quevedo-Blasco, Raúl; Buela-Casal, Gualberto

doi:10.11144/javeriana.upsy9-2.gpba

Cited by 33 publications

(11 citation statements)

References 27 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Shortening the context even further, Krampen (2008), evaluate university Psychology Departments based on citation analysis, and Mahoney, Buboltz, Calvert, & Hoffmann (2010), give an overview of the production of Psychology's institutions through a publication's analysis in journals of the American Psychology Association. Globally speaking, Navarrete-Cortes, Fernández-López, López-Baena, Quevedo-Blasco, and Buela-Casal (2010), describes a countries' qualification according to their impact and scientific output in Psychology journals including the Web of Science.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Scientific Production in Psychology

Martínez

Guerrero‐Bote

Anegón³

2012

Univ Psychol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study examines world scientific production in Psychology based on bibliometric indicators (scientific production, production’s percentage variation, average citations per document, normalized citation, impact, etc.), for the period 2003–2008. The analysis is made by country, by research institutions, and scientific journals, using the Scopus (Elsevier), database of scientific literature. The results show that total world production has increased over the period studied. Four groups are acknowledge for each country, institutions, and journals, taking into account their values of scientific production, normalized citation, and subject specialization.

show abstract

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Scientific Production in Psychology

Martínez

Guerrero‐Bote

Anegón³

2012

Univ Psychol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…We extracted the dataset for this study from SSCI-JCR and SCIE-JCR, which are the only databases of the main Web of Science collection for which the Impact Factor of the Journal Citation Report (JCR) is calculated (Biglu, 2008 ; Golubic et al, 2008 ; Navarrete-Cortés et al, 2010 ; Ruiz-Pérez and Jiménez-Contreras, 2019 ), restricting itself to only documents of the type articles (DT), independent of the language of the main text (LA), but using data and metadata in English. We excluded all indices without impact calculation: Arts & Humanities Citation Index (A & HCI), Conference Proceedings Citation Index- Science (CPCI-S), Conference Proceedings Citation Index-Social Science & Humanities (CPCI-SSH), Book Citation Index–Science (BKCI-S), Book Citation Index–Social Sciences & Humanities (BKCI-SSH), and Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Scientometric Systematic Review of Entrepreneurial Wellbeing Knowledge Production

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article presents a scientometric study regarding entrepreneurship and its relationship with wellbeing. The study presents a systematic review and measures impact and relational character to identify the relevance of countries, research organizations, and authors in the field of entrepreneurial wellbeing. The study poses the following research questions: What is the nature of the evolution of scientific knowledge in the entrepreneurial wellbeing field? What is the nature of the concentration in terms of geographical distribution and co-authorship level of knowledge production in the entrepreneurial wellbeing field? What are the knowledge trends in knowledge production for entrepreneurial wellbeing literature? The contribution of this research is two-fold. First, in terms of methodology, it contributes study into the use of a more robust approach to search for the scientometric trends about entrepreneurship wellbeing in addition to the PRISMA review tools and the PICOS eligibility criteria. Secondly, the study presents research updates in the search for results for the last 2 years of knowledge production. This upgrade is particularly important in a research field that presents exponential growth, where 2019 and 2020 presented almost double the amount of knowledge production compared to 2017 and 2018.

show abstract

“…Scientific journals are trusted sources for scientific communication, a channel that facilitates the research's knowledge transfer, and a scenario for discussion. As such, journals have presented trends in knowledge produced by singular researchers, research teams, academic communities, institutions, countries, regions, or areas of expertise (Ganga, Paredes, & Pedraja-Renga, 2015;López-López et al, 2018;Navarrete-Cortés, Fernández-López, López-Baena, Quevedo-Blasco, & Buela-Casal, 2010;Pire, 2015;Zych & Buela Casal, 2010). The knowledge gathered in scientific journals can be collected in databases for further varied contents analysis.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

The Fiftieth Anniversary of the Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología: A Bibliometric Analysis

Salas

Vega-Arce

González

et al. 2019

RLP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of this study was to conduct a bibliometric analysis of the Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología (RLP) journal in commemoration of its fiftieth anniversary in order to discover its evolution as a journal and its scientific production. We extracted a dataset from the Web of Science's principal collection from 1975 to 2017. This contained a total sample of 2,163 scientific documents, which were processed using Excel and SciMat programmes. The bibliometric indicators used were H-Classics, TC2, identification of the most commonly cited authors and journals, and references. We used Lotka's Law to analyse research productivity. Results showed that the content included 48.6% scientific articles and 42.1% book reviews. Spain had the highest number of articles published. Burrhus Skinner, Rubén Ardila, Rogelio Díaz Guerrero, and Albert Bandura were the most commonly cited authors. Analyses revealed certain strengths of and challenges faced by the RLP. Future research should compare these results with journals from other countries.

show abstract

Global psychology: a bibliometric analysis of Web of Science publications

Cited by 33 publications

References 27 publications

Scientific Production in Psychology

Scientific Production in Psychology

A Scientometric Systematic Review of Entrepreneurial Wellbeing Knowledge Production

The Fiftieth Anniversary of the Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología: A Bibliometric Analysis

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About