2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0308-597x(00)00042-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Globalisation, local capitalism and fishery communities in change

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The restructuring of the processing sector is covered in Jakobsen (2001, 2002) andFløysand and Lindkvist (2001).2 In the late 1990s, Nutreco moved into production and acquired Marine Harvest facilities in Scotland, Ireland and Chile. It also acquired one of (footnote continued) Chile's largest domestic firms (Mares Australes) and merged it with Marine Harvest facilities in Chile.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The restructuring of the processing sector is covered in Jakobsen (2001, 2002) andFløysand and Lindkvist (2001).2 In the late 1990s, Nutreco moved into production and acquired Marine Harvest facilities in Scotland, Ireland and Chile. It also acquired one of (footnote continued) Chile's largest domestic firms (Mares Australes) and merged it with Marine Harvest facilities in Chile.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They concluded that differences between the two villages at the household and community levels, such as early decisions regarding investments in physical capital (such as shrimp boats), reduced dependence on external initiatives, and stronger contacts with local decision‐making were significant factors causing the different outcomes. Fløysand and Lindkvist (2001) describe a similar situation between two communities in Finnmark, Norway, and Ommer and Team (2007) and Murray et al. (2005) have found likewise in Newfoundland.…”
Section: Discussion and Policy Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…They concluded that differences between the two villages at the household and community levels, such as early decisions regarding investments in physical capital (such as shrimp boats), reduced dependence on external initiatives, and stronger contacts with local decision-making were significant factors causing the different outcomes. Fløysand and Lindkvist (2001) describe a similar situation between two communities in Finnmark, Norway, and Ommer and Team (2007) and Murray et al (2005) have found likewise in Newfoundland. In a study of climate impacts and vulnerability in Norway, O'Brien et al (2004) also recognized that vulnerability depended on the scale of the analysis and that exposure and sensitivity to climate, and the social and economic conditions that influence adaptive capacity, vary greatly across scales.…”
Section: Discussion and Policy Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…individuals operating in several, often overlapping, time-spatial 'social fields' (Grønhaug, 1978, Fløysand and Jakobsen, 2001, Fløysand and Lindkvist, 2001, Fløysand and Sjøholt, 2007, as shown in particular in Paper #1 (connecting SRQs 1/2 and 3). This perspective on institutional agency is also closely connected to how multi-dimensionality plays out in territories and over multiple scales, as shown in particular in Paper #3 (connecting SRQ3 and 4).…”
Section: Towards An Analytical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%