2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.epidem.2021.100510
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Globally local: Hyper-local modeling for accurate forecast of COVID-19

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Their approach incorporated a Lagrangian movement model that captures population movements within and among regions. Gopalakrishnan et al [ 53 ] emphasized the impact of spatial granularity on COVID-19 forecasting results using different unit areas of state, county cluster and county; however, they did not take into account the spatial interactions between these areal units in their compartmental forecasting model. Liu and Li [ 54 ] proposed a multi-group SEIR model taking into account the spatial heterogeneity through incorporating spatial diffusion and heterogeneity in the model parameters.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their approach incorporated a Lagrangian movement model that captures population movements within and among regions. Gopalakrishnan et al [ 53 ] emphasized the impact of spatial granularity on COVID-19 forecasting results using different unit areas of state, county cluster and county; however, they did not take into account the spatial interactions between these areal units in their compartmental forecasting model. Liu and Li [ 54 ] proposed a multi-group SEIR model taking into account the spatial heterogeneity through incorporating spatial diffusion and heterogeneity in the model parameters.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Brizzi et al [ 2 ] pointed out that there is a tendency to overestimate the parameter R 0 and the basic effective reproduction R t during the onset of an epidemic. Gopalakrishnan et al pointed out that data otherwise reliable obtained for a specific geographical region, no matter how large, does not necessarily apply in other locations [ 3 ]. Moreover, they stress that state-level data are defective, when applied to policy decisions for smaller areas, since they lead to errors which can be as large as 200 to 300%.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%