2015
DOI: 10.1128/aem.02928-14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Glutamate Decarboxylase-Dependent Acid Resistance in Brucella spp.: Distribution and Contribution to Fitness under Extremely Acidic Conditions

Abstract: f Brucella is an expanding genus of major zoonotic pathogens, including at least 10 genetically very close species occupying a wide range of niches from soil to wildlife, livestock, and humans. Recently, we have shown that in the new species Brucella microti, the glutamate decarboxylase (Gad)-dependent system (GAD system) contributes to survival at a pH of 2.5 and also to infection in mice by the oral route. In order to study the functionality of the GAD system in the genus Brucella, 47 isolates, representativ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
53
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One special feature of the newly described or ‘atypical’ Brucella is a functional glutamate decarboxylase‐dependent system that favours both survival at low pH thereby facilitating oral infection and a useful distinguishing marker to classical brucellae and closely related genera (Damiano et al . ). Nevertheless, apart from provisional classifications, further heterogeneities with respect to variant lipopolysaccharides (LPS), phage lysis, serum agglutination and dye sensitivities are observed (Whatmore et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One special feature of the newly described or ‘atypical’ Brucella is a functional glutamate decarboxylase‐dependent system that favours both survival at low pH thereby facilitating oral infection and a useful distinguishing marker to classical brucellae and closely related genera (Damiano et al . ). Nevertheless, apart from provisional classifications, further heterogeneities with respect to variant lipopolysaccharides (LPS), phage lysis, serum agglutination and dye sensitivities are observed (Whatmore et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…With respect to their 16S rRNA and recA genes, almost all 'classical' species and also B. microti share identical gene sequences, whereas B. inopinata, B. papionis and B. vulpis show a few differences of two to three nucleotides . One special feature of the newly described or 'atypical' Brucella is a functional glutamate decarboxylase-dependent system that favours both survival at low pH thereby facilitating oral infection and a useful distinguishing marker to classical brucellae and closely related genera (Damiano et al 2015). Nevertheless, apart from provisional classifications, further heterogeneities with respect to variant lipopolysaccharides (LPS), phage lysis, serum agglutination and dye sensitivities are observed (Whatmore et al 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, the expression of ADI and CK were not detected in RNA-seq and metabolome analysis, but the proteins were detected in the proteome. Moreover, the glutamate decarboxylase (GAD) pathway, which can consume H + [35], did not show significant differential expression in the mutant I, II, and III, respectively. Therefore, the trajectory of change of ADI and GAD remained consistent, whereby mutant II showed more positive regulation of ADI and GAD, while mutant I was more positive in the regulation of CK.…”
Section: Strainmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the last decade, new species of Brucella, such as Brucella microti, Brucella inopinata and isolates from Australian rodents and amphibians, have been described [2]. These strains are metabolically more active, acidresistant and fast-growing when compared to the wellknown classical, human-pathogenic Brucella species, which include Brucella abortus, Brucella melitensis, Brucella suis and Brucella canis [2][3][4][5][6][7]. Their isolation from hitherto unknown wildlife hosts and the environment raised the question whether Brucella may be transmitted from these reservoirs to livestock and humans living in officially brucellosis-free areas of the world.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%