The primary structural information of proteins employed as biotherapeutics is essential if one wishes to understand their structure-function relationship, as well as in the rational design of new therapeutics and for quality control. Given both the large size (around 150 kDa) and the structural complexity of intact immunoglobulin G (IgG), which includes a variable number of disulfide bridges, its extensive fragmentation and subsequent sequence determination by means of tandem mass spectrometry ( Top-down mass spectrometry (MS) 1 (1-3) has continued to demonstrate its particular advantages over traditionally employed bottom-up MS strategies (4). Specifically, top-down MS allows the characterization of specific protein isoforms originating from the alternative splicing of mRNA that code single nucleotide polymorphisms and/or post-translational modifications (PTMs) of protein species (5). Intact protein molecular weight (MW) determination and subsequent gasphase fragmentation of selected multiply charged protein ions (referred to as tandem MS or MS/MS) theoretically might result in complete protein sequence coverage and precise assignment of the type and position of PTMs, amino acid substitutions, and C-or N-terminal truncations (6), whereas the bottom-up MS approach allows only the identification of a certain protein family when few or redundant peptides are found for a particular protein isoform. At a practical level, however, top-down MS-based proteomics struggles not only with the single-or multi-dimensional separation of undigested proteins, which demonstrates lower reproducibility and repeatability than for peptides, but also with technical limitations present in even state-of-the-art mass spectrometers. The outcome of a top-down MS experiment depends indeed on the balance between the applied resolution of the mass spectrometer and its sensitivity. The former is required for unambiguous assignment of ion isotopic clusters in both survey and MS/MS scans, whereas the latter is ultimately dependent on the scan speed of the mass analyzer, which determines the number of scans that can be accumulated for a given analyte ion on the liquid chromatography (LC) timescale to enhance the resulting signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). Until recently, the instrument of choice for top-down MS has been the Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance (FT-ICR) mass From the ‡Biomolecular Mass