2018
DOI: 10.1002/nme.5996
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Goal‐oriented adaptivity for linear elastic micromorphic continua based on primal and adjoint consistency analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here, z h is the FE solution of the approximate dual problem (C2), which is not directly useful for the error representation (44) due to the Galerkin orthogonality. For this reason, we use, in this work, a patch recovery approach developed in our previous works 61,63 to construct an approximate solution of…”
Section: B4 Interaction Direct Derivativementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Here, z h is the FE solution of the approximate dual problem (C2), which is not directly useful for the error representation (44) due to the Galerkin orthogonality. For this reason, we use, in this work, a patch recovery approach developed in our previous works 61,63 to construct an approximate solution of…”
Section: B4 Interaction Direct Derivativementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this manner, the load term trueF can be equivalently replaced by the second term in Equation , which can be easily localized into its element contributions. For a numerical efficiency, the patch recovery can be used to approximate the enhanced primal problem in a similar manner as for the enhanced dual solution truebold-italiczh+ in Appendix C.…”
Section: Goal‐oriented Adaptivity On the Macroscalementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the actual application process, the main incongruous actuator group behaviors are as follows: When a symmetrical flatness defect is detected by shapemeter roll, the work roll tilting may participate in the flatness regulating process [7][8][9]. However, the additional flatness change is caused by work roll tilting, which will consume the regulating margin of other actuators in the flatness closed-loop control system [10][11][12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%