Governing Sustainable Forest Management Issues in Polycentric Governance

Dlamini, Cliff S.; Montouroy, Yves

doi:10.1177/1461452917691863

Cited by 10 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Namun demikian, perlu dicatat bahwa secara de facto Indonesia Kajian pustaka yang mendiskusikan fenomena FLEGT sejauh ini sudah cukup banyak. Secara garis besar kajian pustaka ini dapat dikategorikan ke dalam tiga kelompok besar, yaitu pertama, kajian yang mengaitkan FLEGT dengan rezim politik kehutanan internasional (Dlamini & Montouroy, 2017;Overdevest & Zeitlin, 2014a, 2014b; kedua, kajian yang mendiskusikan isu FLEGT dalam konteks kebijakan nasional negara mitra yang menggambarkan adanya dinamika politik domestik dalam penerapan rezim FLEGT (Maryudi, 2016a;McDermott et al, 2020;Setyowati & McDermott, 2017; van Heeswijk & Turnhout, 2013Schmitz, 2016Wibowo & Giessen, 2018); dan ketiga adalah kajian yang membahas FLEGT dalam kajian diplomasi ekonomi yang menggambarkan keterlibatan aktor non-negara pada perundingan VPA (Indrawati, 2016).…”

Section: Pendahuluanunclassified

Diplomasi Indonesia Dalam Perdagangan Kayu Ke Uni Eropa : Studi Kasus Penundaan Implementasi Lisensi FLEGT

Hariyadi

Isnaeni

2021

INTERMESTIC

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Indonesia merupakan negara pertama yang berhasil menerbitkan Lisensi Forest Law Environment, Governance and Trade (FLEGT), sebuah regulasi internasional berbasis mekanisme pasar yang diinisiasi oleh Uni Eropa untuk mendorong tata kelola hutan yang berkerlanjutan, khususnya di negara-negara berkembang. Capaian ini seringkali dianggap sebagai keberhasilan diplomasi ekonomi Indonesia. Namun, temuan awal menunjukan terdapat perubahan sikap yang dilakukan Indonesia pada proses negosiasi bersama Uni Eropa pada kurun waktu 2015-2016. Oleh karenaitu, artikel ini bertujuan menganalisis faktor-faktor yang melatarbelakangi perubahan sikap Indonesia dalam proses negosiasi penerbitan Lisensi FLEGT. Dengan menggunakan metode penelitian kualitatif dan pendekatan studi kasus tunggal yang dipandu oleh Teori Faktor-Faktor Pembentuk Diplomasi Ekonomidari Stephen Woolcock (2016). Tulisan ini berargumen bahwa sikap Indonesia didasari oleh adanya hubungan asimetris antara Indonesia dan Uni Eropa dalam implementasi FLEGT, inkoherensi kebijakan antara kementerian dan lembaga terkait, dan perbedaan persepsi antara aktor pemangku kepentingan terkait kewajiban SVLK (Sistem Verifikasi Legalitas Kayu). Penelitian ini menemukan bahwa proses pembentukan kebijakan negara dalam diplomasi ekonomi terkait dengan pertimbangan dari faktor sistemik, domestik dan ideasional berupa perbedaan persepsi antara aktor-aktor yang berkepentingan.

show abstract

Section: Pendahuluanunclassified

Diplomasi Indonesia Dalam Perdagangan Kayu Ke Uni Eropa : Studi Kasus Penundaan Implementasi Lisensi FLEGT

Hariyadi

Isnaeni

2021

INTERMESTIC

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…At the same time, forest degradation reduces forest health and function, resulting in a 12-17% annual increase in carbon dioxide emissions (Dooley & Ozinga, 2011). Many projects have been launched to save forests, either through multilateral means, the use of commercial agreements, or voluntary instruments such as forestry certification (Dlamini & Montouroy, 2017). However, the aforementioned measures are ineffective in the implementation process since they lack the legal authority to prevent further deforestation and degradation.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Indonesian Efforts and Delays in Forest Law Enforcement, Governance and Trade (FLEGT )License Implementation within the European Union

Oswiputra

2023

JLAST

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The purpose of this article is to analyze the factors contributing to Indonesia's evolving stance during negotiations for issuing FLEGT Licenses, employing qualitative research techniques and a single case study approach. Stephen Woolcock's Economic Diplomacy Theory is utilized as the analytical framework. This paper argues that structural, domestic, and ideological factors influence Indonesia's policy adjustments in response to the FLEGT license mechanism. The study reveals issues such as an imbalanced relationship between Indonesia and the EU in FLEGT implementation, policy inconsistencies among Indonesian governmental bodies involved, and perceptual discrepancies among stakeholders engaged in the process. The findings suggest that, in Indonesia's case, Woolcock's theory factors interact, with the pivotal relationship between interest and institutional variables within the domestic decision-making process significantly impacting changes in Indonesia's stance on economic diplomacy practices

show abstract

“…With the emergence of biodiversity preservation and global climate change mitigation issues on the international relations agenda, tropical forests have become much more significant for global sustainability goals [1][2][3][4][5][6][7]. Since the pre-Rio Brundtland report entitled 'Our Common Future', many rounds of negotiations have been held at international, transnational, and national levels to define or reinforce a set of policy measures (rules, principles, norms) and forest-related instruments.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Inside Forest Diplomacy: A Case Study of the Congo Basin under Global Environmental Governance

Nago

Ongolo

2021

Forests

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The growing global interest in biodiversity conservation and the role of forestland sustainability in climate change mitigation has led to the emergence of a new specific field of global environmental governance that we called ‘forest diplomacy’. With the largest tropical forest area after the Amazon, Congo Basin countries (CBc) constitute a major negotiation bloc within global forest-related governance arenas. Despite this position, CBc seem embedded in a failure trap with respect to their participation in forest diplomacy arenas. This paper examines the major causes of the recurrent failures of CBc within forest diplomacy. A qualitative empirical approach (including key informant interviews, groups discussion, participant observation, and policy document review) was used. From a conceptual and theoretical perspective, this research combines global and political sociology approaches including environmentality and blame avoidance works. The main finding reveals that the recurrent failures of CBc in forest diplomacy are partly due to the lack of strategic and bureaucratic autonomy of CBc that strongly depend on financial, technical, and knowledge resources from Western cooperation agencies or consultancy firms. Our discussion highlights that this dependency is maintained by most of the key actor groups involved in forest diplomacy related to CBc, as they exploit these failures to serve their private interests while avoiding the blame of not reducing deforestation and biodiversity loss in the Congo Basin.

show abstract

Governing Sustainable Forest Management Issues in Polycentric Governance

Abstract: International audienc

Cited by 10 publications

References 0 publications

Diplomasi Indonesia Dalam Perdagangan Kayu Ke Uni Eropa : Studi Kasus Penundaan Implementasi Lisensi FLEGT

Diplomasi Indonesia Dalam Perdagangan Kayu Ke Uni Eropa : Studi Kasus Penundaan Implementasi Lisensi FLEGT

Indonesian Efforts and Delays in Forest Law Enforcement, Governance and Trade (FLEGT )License Implementation within the European Union

Inside Forest Diplomacy: A Case Study of the Congo Basin under Global Environmental Governance

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About