2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0148-6195(00)00047-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Governmental versus self-regulation of derivative markets: examining the U.S. and Brazilian experience

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Those countries lacked the capacities to effectively develop or apply regulations. These and related weaknesses led to various shortcomings in implementation (Khanna 2001, Lazzarini & de Mello 2001 forthcoming):…”
Section: Debate On Regulation Of Global Supply Chainsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Those countries lacked the capacities to effectively develop or apply regulations. These and related weaknesses led to various shortcomings in implementation (Khanna 2001, Lazzarini & de Mello 2001 forthcoming):…”
Section: Debate On Regulation Of Global Supply Chainsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As mandatory state regulation fell out of favour as a way of addressing globalisation and its discontents, what should be done? In the 1990s, two main answers were given (Lazzarini & de Mello 2001, Cawthorne 2002.…”
Section: Debate On Regulation Of Global Supply Chainsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations