2018
DOI: 10.2514/1.a34117
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

GPS Relative Navigation for the CanX-4 and CanX-5 Formation-Flying Nanosatellites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The source of the control force is typically a reaction control propulsion system. Only a few missions have been realized so far, such as Prisma [8], CanX-4/5 [13] and Hawkeye [14]. Very recently, the Net-Sats [15] formation flight mission has been launched; Yoon [16] demonstrates the use of drag for limited relative orbit control, i.e., the keeping distance between different satellites for collision avoidance.…”
Section: Formation Flightmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The source of the control force is typically a reaction control propulsion system. Only a few missions have been realized so far, such as Prisma [8], CanX-4/5 [13] and Hawkeye [14]. Very recently, the Net-Sats [15] formation flight mission has been launched; Yoon [16] demonstrates the use of drag for limited relative orbit control, i.e., the keeping distance between different satellites for collision avoidance.…”
Section: Formation Flightmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In comparison with flight demonstration missions such as PRISMA and CanX‐4/5, DiGiTaL shows a marked improvement as documented by Table . Both missions estimate the carrier‐phase ambiguity as float values, thereby achieving relative positioning uncertainty of 6 cm and 2 cm (1D RMS), respectively. CanX‐4/5 was able to improve on PRISMA due to the smaller spacecraft size, minimizing the effects of uncertain attitudes and multipath.…”
Section: Verification and Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Global Positioning System relative navigation has been successfully demonstrated in spacecraft formation‐flying science missions such as NASA/DLR's Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE), DLR's TerraSAR‐X Add‐on for Digital Elevation Measurement (TanDEM‐X), and NASA's Magnetospheric Multiscale (MMS) mission . In contrast to the ground‐based approach of these missions, GPS relative navigation has also been pushed to high levels of autonomy on technology demonstration missions like the Swedish Space Corporation's Prototype Research Instruments and Space Mission technology Advancement (PRISMA) mission and Canada's CanX‐4/5 . By exchanging GPS measurements between cooperatively orbiting spacecraft, these missions have been able to achieve relative navigation solutions with unprecedented precision onboard.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Both CubeSats controlled the GPS antenna to ensure that the zenith received as many common GPS signals as possible, and an additional attitude control was conducted to minimize the effect of the slewing of GPS satellites (Johnston‐Lemke & Zee, 2010). It achieved a relative accuracy < 10 cm that degraded to several meters during maneuvering (Kahr et al., 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%