2020
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2007.08060
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

GRADE: Graph Dynamic Embedding

Abstract: Representation learning of static and more recently dynamically evolving graphs has gained noticeable attention. Existing approaches for modelling graph dynamics focus extensively on the evolution of individual nodes independently of the evolution of mesoscale community structures. As a result, current methods do not provide useful tools to study and cannot explicitly capture temporal community dynamics. To address this challenge, we propose GRADE -a probabilistic model that learns to generate evolving node an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One direct real-world application of THVMs could be to serve as null models [65,181] for evolving networks with dynamic node-properties [75]. Dynamic embedding methods [142][143][144][145][146][147][148][149][150][151][152][153][154], or generalizations of inference methods from dynamic SBMs [73], could potentially allow retrieval of H (and perhaps also σ, ω, and f ) from an observed G. Links of real evolving networks may not in general be fully equilibrated relative to the current set of nodecharacteristics, which is a dynamical behavior exhibited by THVMs outside of the quasi-static regime. Hence in some cases, the Equilibrium Property and Qualitative Realism may be in conflict, implying that caution should be used when applying static models to snapshots of evolving networks.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One direct real-world application of THVMs could be to serve as null models [65,181] for evolving networks with dynamic node-properties [75]. Dynamic embedding methods [142][143][144][145][146][147][148][149][150][151][152][153][154], or generalizations of inference methods from dynamic SBMs [73], could potentially allow retrieval of H (and perhaps also σ, ω, and f ) from an observed G. Links of real evolving networks may not in general be fully equilibrated relative to the current set of nodecharacteristics, which is a dynamical behavior exhibited by THVMs outside of the quasi-static regime. Hence in some cases, the Equilibrium Property and Qualitative Realism may be in conflict, implying that caution should be used when applying static models to snapshots of evolving networks.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another study was of a temporal hyper-SBM with ω < 1 which thus exhibits both link-persistence and group-assignment-persistence [73], influencing performance of community detection algorithms and motivating the development of new ones. Another area of relevant work is the rapidly emerging area of dynamic graph embeddings [75,[142][143][144][145][146][147][148][149][150][151][152][153][154], related to the task of inference of hidden-variable trajectories [155].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Average node activity. Average node activity quantifies the average proportion of timestamps during which a node is present within a temporal network [9]. This metric reveals the degree of temporal activity of nodes.…”
Section: Temporal Graph Statisticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some works embed the graph convolution into the recurrent neural network (RNN) based models or attention mechanism [33], which learns to exploit the dynamic information in the graph evolution within a period of time [13], [14], [16], [17], [34], [35], [36]. Some other works are dynamic extensions of ideas applied in the static case inspired by methods such as PageRank [37], graph autoencoder [38] and the topic model [15] to capture both the temporal community dynamics and evolution of graph structure. However, learning embedding from the sequence of graph snapshots sampled from the temporal graph by a regular time interval may lose information by looking only at some snapshots of the graph over time.…”
Section: Temporal Graph Embeddingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, representation learning on dynamic graph has attracted many research attention [10], [11], [12], and they mainly model temporal graphs either as a sequence of snapshots [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], or as real events with timestamps [19], [20], [21], [22], [23], [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%