2021
DOI: 10.1128/msystems.00964-20
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gradient Internal Standard Method for Absolute Quantification of Microbial Amplicon Sequencing Data

Abstract: High-throughput amplicon sequencing is a critical tool for studying microbiota; however, it results only in relative abundance data. Thus, changes in absolute abundance of microbiota cannot be determined, which hinders further microbiology research. We have therefore established a gradient internal standard absolute quantification (GIS-AQ) method to overcome this issue, which can simultaneously obtain the absolute abundances of bacteria and fungi. Deviations from the quantitative equations of microbes and inte… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Simultaneous quantification and composition analysis of environmental microbes has been studied by incorporating different internal standards (bacterial species/strains and chimeric DNA). , The use of synthetic spike-in internal standards (harboring conserved identical regions) into the 16S rRNA gene for quantitative sequencing (qSeq) has proven for analysis of absolute abundance across the samples. Moreover, quantification accuracy in qSeq has tested with qPCR and microscopic methods. The quantitative data derived by each method had no significant difference with qSeq quantification. , This ensures qSeq as a powerful approach for quantitative studies. But qSeq has not yet been used to quantify bacterial pathogens in environmental samples.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Simultaneous quantification and composition analysis of environmental microbes has been studied by incorporating different internal standards (bacterial species/strains and chimeric DNA). , The use of synthetic spike-in internal standards (harboring conserved identical regions) into the 16S rRNA gene for quantitative sequencing (qSeq) has proven for analysis of absolute abundance across the samples. Moreover, quantification accuracy in qSeq has tested with qPCR and microscopic methods. The quantitative data derived by each method had no significant difference with qSeq quantification. , This ensures qSeq as a powerful approach for quantitative studies. But qSeq has not yet been used to quantify bacterial pathogens in environmental samples.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The quantitative data derived by each method had no significant difference with qSeq quantification. 26,27 This ensures qSeq as a powerful approach for quantitative studies. But qSeq has not yet been used to quantify bacterial pathogens in environmental samples.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16 Real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), a classic method for absolute quantification, has been used to count absolute microbial numbers. 17,18 Recently, a new internal standard method has been proposed to determine the absolute number of microorganisms in food and environment using the sequencing. 19,20 Since the efficiency of bacterial DNA extraction is difficult to achieve 100%, heterogeneous among taxa, and the extraction may cause damage to some DNA, using DNA from previous studies as an internal standard may have resulted in some inaccuracies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, quantitative sequencing methods have been developed to spike microbial DNA (Lin et al, 2018; Smets et al, 2016) or viable bacteria absent in the sample (Stämmler et al, 2016), or to add synthetic 16S rRNA (Tourlousse et al, 2017) or 16S‐18S‐internal transcribed spacer regions (Tkacz et al, 2018; Wang et al, 2021) as standards for high‐throughput quantitative microbial community analysis. These quantitative sequencing methods can be divided into two quantitative patterns: (i) the total number of a target gene in a sample is calculated from the internal standard gene (ISG) read ratio and the total number of ISG molecules added to the sample (Galagoda et al, 2023; Lin et al, 2018; Smets et al, 2016; Stämmler et al, 2016; Tkacz et al, 2018) or (ii) the target gene read numbers are converted to copy numbers using a dose–response curve as an internal standard curve, which is estimated based on the ISG read numbers with known gene copy numbers (Tourlousse et al, 2017; Wang et al, 2021). However, neither method is widespread enough to replace qPCR.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%