“…In recent years, quantitative sequencing methods have been developed to spike microbial DNA (Lin et al, 2018; Smets et al, 2016) or viable bacteria absent in the sample (Stämmler et al, 2016), or to add synthetic 16S rRNA (Tourlousse et al, 2017) or 16S‐18S‐internal transcribed spacer regions (Tkacz et al, 2018; Wang et al, 2021) as standards for high‐throughput quantitative microbial community analysis. These quantitative sequencing methods can be divided into two quantitative patterns: (i) the total number of a target gene in a sample is calculated from the internal standard gene (ISG) read ratio and the total number of ISG molecules added to the sample (Galagoda et al, 2023; Lin et al, 2018; Smets et al, 2016; Stämmler et al, 2016; Tkacz et al, 2018) or (ii) the target gene read numbers are converted to copy numbers using a dose–response curve as an internal standard curve, which is estimated based on the ISG read numbers with known gene copy numbers (Tourlousse et al, 2017; Wang et al, 2021). However, neither method is widespread enough to replace qPCR.…”