The graft–copolymerization of silk with methacrylamide (MAA), 2‐hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA), and methyl methacrylate (MMA) was studied using three different free‐radical initiators: an inorganic peroxide [ammonium persulfate (APS)] and two azo compounds [2,2′‐azobisisobutyronitrile (AIBN) and 2,2′‐azobis(2‐methylpropionamidine) dihydrochloride (ADC)]. The rate and yield of grafting followed the order: APS > AIBN > ADC. The performance of AIBN was close to that of APS in terms of weight gain attained. The degree of yellowing of grafted silk varied as a function of the initiator–monomer system used. APS induced the highest degree of yellowing, regardless of which monomer was used, whereas silk grafted with the MAA/AIBN system displayed the lowest level of yellowing. Moisture regain of grafted silk changed as a function of the hydrophilic/hydrophobic character of the grafted polymer, regardless of the kind of initiator used. Accordingly, tensile properties showed a tendency to decrease with increasing weight gain of grafted silk, the extent of which was independent of the kind of monomer and initiator used. The different initiators did not induce any appreciable change in the fine structure of silk, as demonstrated by optical measurements. Uneven surface deposition of homopolymer was detected to variable extent with MMA and HEMA grafting, whereas the surface of MAA‐grafted silk was completely free of any foreign deposit, independently of the initiator used. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 81: 1401–1409, 2001