Grammatik der deutschen Sprache

Strecker, Bruno; Hoffmann, Ludger; Zifonun, Gisela

doi:10.1515/9783110872163

Cited by 132 publications

(19 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…In diesem umfangreichen Werk werden nämlich nur allein stehende dass-Sätze mit Verbletztwortfolge angesprochen (vgl. Zifonun et al 1997: 142 sowie 154ff. ), die allein stehenden Konditionalsätze werden jedoch auch hier nicht behandelt.…”

Section: Szenario-und Narrationsbasierte Prädikative Metonymie Am Beispiel Verbaler Idiomeunclassified

Funktionen der Metonymie im Sprachvergleich am Beispiel von Deutsch und Ungarisch

Brdar-Szabó¹

2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

2 Es sei hier auf quantitative Angaben in standardisierten elektronischen Datenbanken wie etwa EBSCO verwiesen. 3 Das englische Original lautet dazu 7th International Cognitive Linguistics Conference. Die Konferenz fand zwischen dem 22. und 27. Juli 2001 an der Universität von California, Santa Barbara statt. 4 Die in dieser thematischen Sektion präsentierten Vorträge wurden in einem speziellen Themenheft der Zeitschrift Jezikoslovlje veröffentlicht. Vgl. dazu Panther/Thornburg, eds. (2003b).8 Ich meine damit vor allem die Beiträge in Panther/Thornburg, eds. (2003a). Kapitel 4.1 bietet einen Überblick über den aktuellen Forschungsstand auf diesem Gebiet.9 Die allgemeinen Metonymien entsprechen den "high-level metonymies" bei Panther/Thornburg, die speziellen den "low-level metonymies".10 Übersetzung der Verfasserin. Das Originalzitat: "Metonymy is a cognitive process in which one conceptual entity, the vehicle, provides mental access to another conceptual entity, the target, within the same idealized cognitive model." (Radden/Kövecses 1999: 21) 11 Vgl. Kövecses/Radden (1998).

show abstract

Section: Szenario-und Narrationsbasierte Prädikative Metonymie Am Beispiel Verbaler Idiomeunclassified

Funktionen der Metonymie im Sprachvergleich am Beispiel von Deutsch und Ungarisch

Brdar-Szabó¹

2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Broekhuis et al 2015:295) In German, we potentially have two structures containing a silent PPF. However, only the wPPF can be silent: in those cases in which the proform is optional, it can only be omitted if the CP is in the postfield (see IDS-Grammatik 1997:1478-1483, Webelhuth 1992:100, 106, Bayer 1995, where the clause can occupy different positions with the strong form. In our analysis with two underlying patterns, this is straightforward.…”

Section: Evidence In Dutch and Germanmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The PPF is optional with some verbs in German and Dutch. It should be noted that we restrict the notion of a PPF to cases where the pronominal adverb enters an intrasentential phoric relation, figuring as what has been called a "correlate" in the German grammar tradition (IDS-Grammatik 1997:1475-1490, Haider 2010, otherwise also addressed as a "resumptive pronoun." (We disregard dislocation structures for the moment, but see below.)…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…That is why we talk about accentuation of the R-pronoun part of the forms. One could assume that the reduced form is nothing but a phonetic variant of the non-reduced one because it is non-accented (see(IDS-Grammatik 1997:1477 for a position along these lines). However, since these forms can also be found in written texts (e. g. newspapers) we regard them as independent lexicalized forms.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Remarks on prepositional object clauses in Germanic

Gunkel

Hartmann

2020

NLY

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper analyses the variation we find in the realization of finite clausal complements in the position of prepositional objects in a set of Germanic languages. The Germanic languages differ with respect to whether prepositions can directly select a clause (North Germanic) or not and instead need a prepositional proform (Continental West Germanic). Within the Continental West Germanic languages, we find further differences with respect to the constituent structures. We propose that German strong vs. weak prepositional proforms (e.g. drauf vs. darauf) differ with respect to their syntax, while this is not the case for the Dutch forms (ervan vs. daarvan). What the Germanic languages under consideration share is that the prepositional element can be covert, except in English. English shows only limited evidence for the presence of P with finite clauses in the position of prepositional objects generally, but only with a selected set of verbs. This investigation is a first step towards a broader study of the nature of clauses in prepositional object positions and the implications for the syntax of clausal complementation.

show abstract

“…Finally, speakers may employ adjectival modification by using the past participle and the prepositional phrase encoding the agent as illustrated in (4d). Past participles are morphologically composed of the verb stem, the suffix -t or -en, and often the prefix ge-(see Zifonun et al 1997).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Can Frequency Account for the Grammatical Choices of Children and Adults in Nominal Modification Contexts? Evidence from Elicited Production and Child-Directed Speech

Sanfelici

Schulz

2021

Languages

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

There is consensus that languages possess several grammatical variants satisfying the same conversational function. Nevertheless, it is a matter of debate which principles guide the adult speaker’s choice and the child’s acquisition order of these variants. Various proposals have suggested that frequency shapes adult language use and language acquisition. Taking the domain of nominal modification as its testing ground, this paper explores in two studies the role that frequency of structures plays for adults’ and children’s structural choices in German. In Study 1, 133 three- to six-year-old children and 21 adults were tested with an elicited production task prompting participants to identify an agent or a patient referent among a set of alternatives. Study 2 analyzed a corpus of child-directed speech to examine the frequency of passive relative clauses, which children, similar to adults, produced very often in Study 1. Importantly, passive relatives were found to be infrequent in the child input. These two results show that the high production rate of rare structures, such as passive relatives, is difficult to account for with frequency. We claim that the relation between frequency in natural speech and use of a given variant in a specific context is indirect: speakers may opt for the less grammatically complex computation rather than for the variant most frequently used in spontaneous speech.

show abstract

Grammatik der deutschen Sprache

Cited by 132 publications

References 0 publications

Funktionen der Metonymie im Sprachvergleich am Beispiel von Deutsch und Ungarisch

Funktionen der Metonymie im Sprachvergleich am Beispiel von Deutsch und Ungarisch

Remarks on prepositional object clauses in Germanic

Can Frequency Account for the Grammatical Choices of Children and Adults in Nominal Modification Contexts? Evidence from Elicited Production and Child-Directed Speech

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About