Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms 2013
DOI: 10.1137/1.9781611973105.112
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Graph Products Revisited: Tight Approximation Hardness of Induced Matching, Poset Dimension and More

Abstract: Graph product is a fundamental tool with rich applications in both graph theory and theoretical computer science.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
50
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is indicated by the fact that we have no heuristics or approximation algorithms to produce realizers of partial orders that have reasonable size. A hardness result for approximations was first obtained by Hegde and Jain [12] and recently strengthened by Chalermsook et al [4]. They show that unless NP = ZPP there exists no polynomial algorithm to approximate the dimension of a partial order with a factor of O(n 1−ε ) for any ε > 0, where n is the number of elements of the input order.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…This is indicated by the fact that we have no heuristics or approximation algorithms to produce realizers of partial orders that have reasonable size. A hardness result for approximations was first obtained by Hegde and Jain [12] and recently strengthened by Chalermsook et al [4]. They show that unless NP = ZPP there exists no polynomial algorithm to approximate the dimension of a partial order with a factor of O(n 1−ε ) for any ε > 0, where n is the number of elements of the input order.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Since, a maximal induced matching in any bi partite graph with B nodes can be recovered upon optimally solving (6) for the corresponding instance (which in turn can be obtained in linear time for the given graph) , we have established a reduction to (6) from the problem of finding a maximal induced matching in a general bi-partite graph with B nodes. The claimed hardness result in the theorem follows upon invoking the recently discovered hardness result in [13] for the latter problem.…”
Section: Optimal Two Time-scale Policymentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Then, note that the user association problem in (9) can be re-formulated as max{f(9)}, f E ;?;. - (13) which is the problem of maximizing a non-negative non decreasing submodular set function subject to a matroid con straint. 0 As a consequence of Proposition 1 we can invoke the famous result in [15 ], which shows that a simple greedy algorithm yields a constant factor approximation for the prob lem of maximizing a non-negative non-decreasing submodular set function subject to one matroid constraint.…”
Section: Optimal Two Time-scale Policymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is a result due to Chalermsook et al [9] using the hardness reduction of Adiga, Bhowmick and Chandran [2]. There is, however, an approximation algorithm with factor o(n) for general graphs; see Adiga et al [1].…”
Section: Theoremmentioning
confidence: 94%