2015
DOI: 10.1002/adma.201500804
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Graphene‐Skeleton Heat‐Coordinated and Nanoamorphous‐Surface‐State Controlled Pseudo‐Negative‐Photoconductivity of Tiny SnO2 Nanoparticles

Abstract: SnO2 nanoparticles display a pseudo-negative-photoconductivity (PsdNPC) effect, which shows that their resistance increases under light irradiation via a heating effect. The PsdNPC originates from intensive electron scattering of the nanoamorphous surface state of the SnO2 nanoparticles, resulting in a small inner current and a large absorption of moisture, leading to a large surface current. Graphene as the inner skeleton can shorten the response and recovery times.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
27
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The value of the Seebeck coefficient (4.43 ± 0.26 mV/K) obtained for our copper selenide sample is 10 2 times larger than the Seebeck coefficients (tens of μV/K) of 2D materials. 19,20 Rise and decay portions of Δ V z versus time curves are fitted (Figure 4e, solid lines) using equations and , respectively, where (Δ V z ) max is the maximum value of the potential gradient produced at a given bias voltage and τ dep and τ res are time constants for carrier depletion from and carrier restoration into the channel region, respectively. Time constants (response times) for carrier depletion from the channel region are ∼1.2, ∼0.95, and ∼0.76 s for bias voltages of 0.4, 0.5, and 0.6 V, respectively, while carrier restoration (recovery times) times in the channel region are ∼0.99 s for all bias voltages.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The value of the Seebeck coefficient (4.43 ± 0.26 mV/K) obtained for our copper selenide sample is 10 2 times larger than the Seebeck coefficients (tens of μV/K) of 2D materials. 19,20 Rise and decay portions of Δ V z versus time curves are fitted (Figure 4e, solid lines) using equations and , respectively, where (Δ V z ) max is the maximum value of the potential gradient produced at a given bias voltage and τ dep and τ res are time constants for carrier depletion from and carrier restoration into the channel region, respectively. Time constants (response times) for carrier depletion from the channel region are ∼1.2, ∼0.95, and ∼0.76 s for bias voltages of 0.4, 0.5, and 0.6 V, respectively, while carrier restoration (recovery times) times in the channel region are ∼0.99 s for all bias voltages.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Electronic transmission mechanisms and photocurrent property of photoconductivity of dipeptides have not been well explored. To date, NPC effects have been reported in a variety of materials ranging from simple low-dimensional nanomaterials (graphene quantum dots, 41 InN nanowire, 42 SnO 2 nanoparticles, 43 and MoS 2 single layer 44 ) to various complex crystal structures (γ-glycine, 45 potassium pentaborate, 46 and KCl-doped sulfamic acid 47 ). The decrease in current was explained by the reduction of carrier density or mobility by light-assisted hot electron trapping and carrier scattering.…”
Section: ■ Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NPC has been observed in semiconducting nanostructures by localized trapped states 18 , band gap opening in topological insulators 16 , e-SPPs scattering in metallic nanowires 17, 33 , adsorbent molecule in graphene based composite systems 34 , doping-induced formation of trions in MoS 2 35 etc. Here we address the origin of the observed NPC by calculating the dc resistivity from Drude’s free electron model which deals with various scattering mechanisms experienced by conduction electrons while travelling under an electric field in the presence of light.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%