2020
DOI: 10.1080/00949655.2020.1803320
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Graphical group ridge

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This method could classify ridge regression predictors in disjoint groups of conditionally correlated variables and derived different penalties (i.e., shrinkage parameters) for predictors groups. [ 56 ] It had the advantage of combining the ridge regression method with graphical model for ill‐conditioned data or high‐dimensional data.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method could classify ridge regression predictors in disjoint groups of conditionally correlated variables and derived different penalties (i.e., shrinkage parameters) for predictors groups. [ 56 ] It had the advantage of combining the ridge regression method with graphical model for ill‐conditioned data or high‐dimensional data.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Distributions are coloured to represent the designation of ‘left’, ‘right’, or ‘neither’ as described by the LI. Distributions are presented as geom_density functions form the ggplot2 and ggridge packages in R [43,44]. These are kernel density estimates and can be considered as smoothed versions of histograms and are designed to provide a non-binned density distribution of continuous data and have scales relevant to the number of dives for each bird.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These datasets are usually known as (n < p) or highdimensional data. Such high-dimensional gene expression datasets are usually not effective for the purpose of classification because of the issue of dimensionality [1], [2]. Moreover, most of the genes in such type of datasets are noisy and have little contribution in the true classification of observations (phenotypes).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%