2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.newast.2009.06.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gravitational microlensing: A parallel, large-data implementation

Abstract: Gravitational lensing allows us to probe the structure of matter on a broad range of astronomical scales, and as light from a distant source traverses an intervening galaxy, compact matter such as planets, stars, and black holes act as individual lenses. The magnification from such microlensing results in rapid brightness fluctuations which reveal not only the properties of the lensing masses, but also the surface brightness distribution in the source. However, while the combination of deflections due to indiv… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
(59 reference statements)
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We now describe our algorithm for computing the light curves of moving sources. There are several methods in the literature, the most popular one being inverse ray shooting, coupled with a hierarchical tree code to efficiently compute deflection angles (see, e.g., Garsden & Lewis 2010, and references within). This method does not solve the lens equation but gives a map of the magnification at any source position down to the pixel scale.…”
Section: Algorithm For Computing Light Curvesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We now describe our algorithm for computing the light curves of moving sources. There are several methods in the literature, the most popular one being inverse ray shooting, coupled with a hierarchical tree code to efficiently compute deflection angles (see, e.g., Garsden & Lewis 2010, and references within). This method does not solve the lens equation but gives a map of the magnification at any source position down to the pixel scale.…”
Section: Algorithm For Computing Light Curvesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also fire rays in parallel, using multiple parallel processes. Using the method of Garsden & Lewis (2010), the map containing the largest number of masses can be generated in ∼14 d on a supercomputer using 16 parallel processes. For the maps with the least number of lens masses, the total time is ∼24 h. About 18 per cent of the compute time is used to generate the lens objects, and the rest is for firing the rays, with many rays fired in parallel.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be used as a probe of the source quasar because the quasar’s size and shape affect the microlensing variability (e.g. Mortonson, Schechter & Wambsganss 2005; Bate et al 2008; Garsden & Lewis 2010; Morgan et al 2010). For example, when the source is large, the changes in the light curve are not as prominent, since the larger source smooths out the variability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We generate 1,575 objects with 1 M⊙ masses for the lens, and no smooth matter, as the images are located in the bulge where stellar matter dominates. We use the inverse ray-tracing method developed by Wambsganss (1990Wambsganss ( , 1999 and Garsden & Lewis (2010) to fire the rays. The width of the map is 20 ER (1.2 pc) at a pixel resolution of 10000 2 pixels, or 0.002 ER (0.00012 pc) per pixel.…”
Section: Magnification Mapsmentioning
confidence: 99%