2016
DOI: 10.1103/physrevx.6.011035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gravitational-Wave Cosmology across 29 Decades in Frequency

Abstract: Quantum fluctuations of the gravitational field in the early Universe, amplified by inflation, produce a primordial gravitational-wave background across a broad frequency band. We derive constraints on the spectrum of this gravitational radiation, and hence on theories of the early Universe, by combining experiments that cover 29 orders of magnitude in frequency. These include Planck observations of cosmic microwave background temperature and polarization power spectra and lensing, together with baryon acousti… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
191
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 189 publications
(197 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
(155 reference statements)
6
191
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, the peak frequency with T ann ∼ 1 GeV is within the target range of pulsar timing observations [50][51][52][53]. The current 95% confidence upper limit reads Ω gw h 2 < 2.3 × 10 −10 at ν 1yr 3 × 10 −8 Hz [52].…”
Section: Jhep08(2016)044supporting
confidence: 61%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Interestingly, the peak frequency with T ann ∼ 1 GeV is within the target range of pulsar timing observations [50][51][52][53]. The current 95% confidence upper limit reads Ω gw h 2 < 2.3 × 10 −10 at ν 1yr 3 × 10 −8 Hz [52].…”
Section: Jhep08(2016)044supporting
confidence: 61%
“…The current 95% confidence upper limit reads Ω gw h 2 < 2.3 × 10 −10 at ν 1yr 3 × 10 −8 Hz [52]. The gravitational waves from the domain wall annihilation have a frequency dependence, Ω gw ∝ ν 3 , at ν < ν peak .…”
Section: Jhep08(2016)044mentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There, Ω GW (f ) exhibits a long plateau (∝ f 0 ) over a frequency range which covers the bands of most GW experiments at the present, e.g., aLIGO/Virgo and the LISA mission. The amplitude of this plateau depends on the value of r alone, independent of f (see, e.g., [102]). For r = 0.01 shown here, this amplitude is ∼ 10 −16 , more than six orders of magnitude below the sensitivities of current GW detectors, which is the main reason why the SGWB from inflation (in ΛCDM) was not expected to be detectable by current major GW detection experiments listed in §I D.…”
Section: Results: Present-day Sgwb Energy Density Spectrum and Itsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…84, which is taken from Lasky et al. (2016). Also shown are curves for theoretical models with a large tensor-to-scalar ratio () and a range of spectral tilts .
Fig.
…”
Section: Prospects For Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%