2004
DOI: 10.1016/s0012-821x(03)00643-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Great earthquakes and slab pull: interaction between seismic coupling and plate–slab coupling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
112
1
6

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(123 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
4
112
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Such high bending stresses thus explain the artificial reduction in basal velocity that we had to apply to our EPSM in order to fit GPS interseismic observations, and allows us to state that the slab-mantle boundary acts as an efficient frictional interface in the bent corner of the slab. This statement is consistent with the argumentation of Buffett (2006) that bending of the subducting plate exerts a basal friction that opposes to the motion of the downgoing plate, and that the driving forces of subduction include slab flexure (Forsyth and Uyeda, 1975), which is partially balanced by local resistance (Conrad et al, 2004).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Such high bending stresses thus explain the artificial reduction in basal velocity that we had to apply to our EPSM in order to fit GPS interseismic observations, and allows us to state that the slab-mantle boundary acts as an efficient frictional interface in the bent corner of the slab. This statement is consistent with the argumentation of Buffett (2006) that bending of the subducting plate exerts a basal friction that opposes to the motion of the downgoing plate, and that the driving forces of subduction include slab flexure (Forsyth and Uyeda, 1975), which is partially balanced by local resistance (Conrad et al, 2004).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The ESPM also includes the kinematic effect of slab flexure near the trench axis by considering a decreasing velocity gradient along the slab's radius of curvature. Plate flexure and its associated bending stresses have been shown to be a fundamental process that connects the dynamic force balance of tectonic plates with the seismic cycle (Conrad et al, 2004;Capitanio and Morra, 2012;Schellart, 2009;Buffett and Rowley, 2006). As demonstrated by Kanda and Simons (2010), the ESPM mimics the deformation field caused by the BSM when the thickness of the subducting plate tends to zero.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Upper plate deformation represents a useful proxy for plate-slab coupling and subduction zone behaviour (Funiciello et al 2003;Conrad, Bilek & Lithgow-Bertelloni, 2004;Lallemand, Heuret & Boutelier, 2005;Regard et al 2004 recently concluded that back-arc opening (or compression) develops if the upper plate velocity is larger (or smaller) than a certain threshold fraction of the lower plate velocity. Friction along the interplate contact and the mantle Stokes reaction acting on the slab are indeed the two main forces competing against slab pull (Arcay, Lallemand & Doin, 2008).…”
Section: C a Case Study For Upper Plate Deformation In A Subductiomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subduction systems where upper plate compression occurs are not common in current subduction zones and may involve continental (Chile) and oceanic (Japan) overriding plates (e.g., Heuret and Lallemand 2005;Heuret et al 2007). It has been recognized that upper plate deformation depends on several internal parameters such as relative motion and velocities of the upper plate, trench, and subducting slab (Conrad et al 2004;Lallemand et al 2005;Heuret et al 2007). Spatial and temporal variations of those parameters may lead to drastic changes not only on the upper plate stress state but also on the subduction geometry (e.g., northwest Pacific subduction zone; Heuret and Lallemand 2005;Heuret et al 2007).…”
Section: Age Constraints and Geodynamic Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%