Green buildings need green occupants

Abstract

The government, along with the Building Research Establishment, recognizes that there is considerable scope for reducing energy consumption by addressing the environmental performance of public buildings, such as schools and universities. It is acknowledged that substantial savings in terms of energy consumption and gaseous emissions can be realized through the construction of low‐energy design or ‘green’ buildings. These low‐energy designs should have produced relatively low annual energy running costs. However, in England alone, it is estimated that in 1997 universities spent £200 million on fuel. The increase in the construction of low‐energy design buildings has not witnessed a subsequent reduction in the energy consumption of these buildings. A detailed study of the electrical consumption of the Queen's Building at Anglia Polytechnic University was undertaken, using the Building Research Establishment's latest environmental School Tool‐Kit. Surprisingly, the actual electrical consumption of the building was found to be 2.5 times greater than the amount originally forecast. Poor housekeeping measures were identified as the most likely reason for this. The education of the occupants of buildings in good housekeeping is the key to successfully reducing electricity consumption and hence, enabling the buildings to function as intended. When occupants display good housekeeping techniques, buildings will perform in an environmentally benign and efficient manner. So, green buildings need green occupants. Technology alone cannot and will not save the environment; it needs to be complemented and supplemented by a change in people's lifestyles and attitudes towards the environment. Copyright © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment.

Beyond eco‐efficiency: understanding CS through the IC practice lens

“…The CS leaders found that in order to achieve and exceed the efficiency stage of CS they have had to bring their business relationships on the journey with them. For example, Browne and Frame (1999) argue that sustainable buildings need sustainable occupants. Company B has found that sharing its knowledge base and intellectual property about sustainable design with its tenants, is vital to implementing and achieving the best possible outcomes in its property portfolio.…”

The Impact of Carbon Emission Reducing Design Features on Office Occupiers’ Choice of Premises

“…A capital outlay in energy-efficient technology may generate energy savings that make the initial investment economical to one occupier but not another, thus making it difficult to quantify the cost savings and justify the capital outlay of a particular carbon-saving technology. The energy savings realised also depend on how effectively occupiers engage and change their working practices as even low-energy buildings will not run efficiently if users prevent the heating, lighting and ventilation systems running at their optimal settings (Browne and Frame, 1999).…”

Illustrating limitations of energy studies of buildings with LCA and actor analysis

“…Only some studies identify the importance of the social nature of energy use, such as the importance of residents' behaviour. Among such studies are Browne and Frame (1999), and recently Ellegå rd (2008).…”