2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.coldregions.2005.09.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ground motion analysis in seasonally frozen regions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The values of the strain amplitude beyond 10 −4 were obtained through the interpolation of the fitting curves. The interpolation was reliable, as some research [19,20] with DTA on frozen soil were conducted under strain amplitudes larger than 10 −4 and those results match the Hardin-Drnevich model.…”
Section: Fig 7 Test Results At Different Temperaturementioning
confidence: 72%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The values of the strain amplitude beyond 10 −4 were obtained through the interpolation of the fitting curves. The interpolation was reliable, as some research [19,20] with DTA on frozen soil were conducted under strain amplitudes larger than 10 −4 and those results match the Hardin-Drnevich model.…”
Section: Fig 7 Test Results At Different Temperaturementioning
confidence: 72%
“…In contrast, research on the shear modulus and damping ratio of frozen soil is limited [3,[18][19][20]. These researches revealed each factor that affects the modulus and damping to a different extent.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This indicates that the frozen soil layer at the ground surface with the unfrozen soil layer below does not amplify seismic waves propagating through the frozen layer as much as its unfrozen state. This difference in the amplification results from its higher shear velocity, leading to smaller site responses as reported in Qi et al 18 and Wang et al 23 Figure 11 compares site responses for the cases S20−5 and W20−5 ( Δ 0 = 20°C and 15 = −5°C), where the seasonal temperature variation at ground surface (Δ 0 ) and the soil temperature at −15 m ( 15 ) are in the middle of the two previous cases. As in the previous cases, Figure 11A shows that the large seasonal difference in spectral acceleration is also observed in the short period range of less than 0.8 s but is smaller compared to the cases S40−10 and W40−10.…”
Section: Site Response Depending On Seasonal Ground Temperature Variationmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Considering the factors mentioned above depending on the material properties, the effects of seasonally cold are very important for estimating the seismic behavior of structures built in cold regions, subjected to earthquake ground motion [8][9][10][11][12][13]. In earthquake regions of our country under the influence of extreme cold, seasonal, or are frequently built of the reinforced concrete minarets have been or are frequently built.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%