2016
DOI: 10.1038/srep37939
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Groundwater helium anomaly reflects strain change during the 2016 Kumamoto earthquake in Southwest Japan

Abstract: Geochemical monitoring of groundwater and soil gas emission pointed out precursor and/or coseismic anomalies of noble gases associated with earthquakes, but there was lack of plausible physico-chemical basis. A laboratory experiment of rock fracturing and noble gas emission was conducted, but there is no quantitative connection between the laboratory results and observation in field. We report here deep groundwater helium anomalies related to the 2016 Kumamoto earthquake, which is an inland crustal earthquake … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

3
81
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(36 reference statements)
3
81
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A sudden increase of the radon concentration was observed before the 1995 Kobe earthquake, which was an onshore earthquake like the 2016 Kumamoto earthquake [ Igarashi et al , ]. One study which supports this model has been published in the case of the 2016 Kumamoto earthquake [ Sano et al , ]. In this study, they collected groundwater samples before and after the 2016 Kumamoto earthquake near the epicenter and found deep groundwater helium anomaly before the main shock.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…A sudden increase of the radon concentration was observed before the 1995 Kobe earthquake, which was an onshore earthquake like the 2016 Kumamoto earthquake [ Igarashi et al , ]. One study which supports this model has been published in the case of the 2016 Kumamoto earthquake [ Sano et al , ]. In this study, they collected groundwater samples before and after the 2016 Kumamoto earthquake near the epicenter and found deep groundwater helium anomaly before the main shock.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…The first profile ( Fig. 10a) is CROP M-31 (Scrocca et al, 2003a) in the version interpreted by Polonia et al (2016). The second one is CA99-215 in Fig.…”
Section: Multichannel Seismic Reflection Profilesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Whether these precursors truly manifest before an earthquake is a different task that has to be accomplished with specific monitoring, as we will explain in the Discussion section. Our aim is nonetheless relevant for many geoscientists as noteworthy examples of earthquake geochemical precursors are documented in many previous works Igarashi et al, 1995;Claesson et al, 2004;Huang and Ding, 2012;Inan et al, 2012;Skelton et al, 2014Skelton et al, , 2019Sano et al, 2016;Barberio et al, 2017;Petitta et al, 2018;Boschetti et al, 2019) and are very promising for the science of earthquake forecasting.…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…For instance, rock deformation produces new (micro) fractures enhancing the release of the trapped volatiles (e.g., He) and as a consequence the fraction of volatiles released from the rocks during deformation, increases with the rock volume changes (dilatancy processes). However, even if some experimental studies show the existence of a direct link between rock deformation/fracturation and the release of He 25,26 , there are only a few of applications in natural systems 21,27,28 . In this study, we investigated the origin and processes controlling the transfer of He through the crust in a seismically active region of the Northern Apennines ( Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%