2015
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-23114-3_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Group Activity Selection from Ordinal Preferences

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nash stability [18] plays a key role since it yields a social agreement among the agents even without having any negotiation. Many researchers have investigated conditions under which a Nash stable partition is guaranteed to exist and to be determined [18], [42]- [44]. Among them, the works in [43], [44] mainly addressed an anonymous hedonic game, in which each agent considers the size of a coalition to which it belongs instead of the identities of the members.…”
Section: B Hedonic Gamesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Nash stability [18] plays a key role since it yields a social agreement among the agents even without having any negotiation. Many researchers have investigated conditions under which a Nash stable partition is guaranteed to exist and to be determined [18], [42]- [44]. Among them, the works in [43], [44] mainly addressed an anonymous hedonic game, in which each agent considers the size of a coalition to which it belongs instead of the identities of the members.…”
Section: B Hedonic Gamesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the fully-connected network case, it becomes O(n 2 a ) because of d G = 1. Note that this algorithmic complexity is less than that of the centralized algorithm, i.e., O(n 2 a · n t ), in [44]. Every agent at each iteration investigates n t + 1 of selectable task-coalition pairs including t φ given a locally-known valid partition (as shown in Line 5 in Algorithm 1).…”
Section: A Algorithmic Complexity (Scalability)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…After the conference version of our paper has been published, several authors explored the complexity of finding good allocations in GASP, both in the approvalbased model, which is the focus of our work (Lee and Vassilevska Williams 2017), and in the ordinal model, where each agent ranks pairs of the form '(activity, group size)' (Darmann 2015). Igarashi et al (2017a, b) and subsequently Gupta et al (2017) considered a variant of GASP where agents are connected by a social network and members of each group have to form a connected subgraph in this network; they adapt the solution concepts that we propose to this richer setting, and put forward a number of algorithms and complexity results.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [3], Darmann re-introduced the General Group Activity Selection Problem, considering the agents' ordinal preferences where each agent can determine the (activity, group size) pair. He analyzed the computational complexity for finding a stable assignment using k-approval scores and considering Nash and core stability.…”
Section: Related Litreturementioning
confidence: 99%