2003
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4471-0057-7_10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

GroupLens for Usenet: Experiences in Applying Collaborative Filtering to a Social Information System

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The shape of this distribution is similar to that observed in other studies of display time [12,13,15]. To adjust this distribution, a logarithm transformation was performed using the natural log.…”
Section: Figure 2 Origin Of Display Timementioning
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The shape of this distribution is similar to that observed in other studies of display time [12,13,15]. To adjust this distribution, a logarithm transformation was performed using the natural log.…”
Section: Figure 2 Origin Of Display Timementioning
confidence: 88%
“…Recent research has had some success using information-seeking behaviors as implicit feedback for document preference [4,5,10,12,13,15,20]. See [4,9,14] for a review and classification of this research.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Schafer [19] examines and categorizes a large set of these commercialized recommender systems. In addition, numerous recommenders in a variety of domains have been developed for research purposes, including GroupLens (Usenet news) [11], Ringo (music) [20], and Jester (jokes) [7].…”
Section: Recommender Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this, they also looked at a sequence of characteristic user behavior patterns. Some earlier work also utilizes dwell distributions for collaborative filtering to predict user ratings [34]. All of that work was done at the document level, whereas we focus here on section-level dwell time.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%