2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2016.02.049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Growth and structure of flocs following electrocoagulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The size range of the DIHM was suitable to measure flocs larger than 50 μm, which are the major source contributing toward total surface area, volume, and mass of flocs. 51 Further analysis, using a Malvern Mastersizer 3000 52 and/or Zetasizer nano, 44 is recommended to examine the small floc size distribution that may have resulted at high energy usage, as carryover of these flocs can pose significant challenges on downstream separation processes (e.g., turbidity breakthrough in filters, reduced filter runtimes, increased organic loading etc.). Recent work by Yu et al 13 suggests that broken flocs may not grow into large aggregates due to a net reduction in the number of active surface hydroxyl groups.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The size range of the DIHM was suitable to measure flocs larger than 50 μm, which are the major source contributing toward total surface area, volume, and mass of flocs. 51 Further analysis, using a Malvern Mastersizer 3000 52 and/or Zetasizer nano, 44 is recommended to examine the small floc size distribution that may have resulted at high energy usage, as carryover of these flocs can pose significant challenges on downstream separation processes (e.g., turbidity breakthrough in filters, reduced filter runtimes, increased organic loading etc.). Recent work by Yu et al 13 suggests that broken flocs may not grow into large aggregates due to a net reduction in the number of active surface hydroxyl groups.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, if the desirability value is low, it is inferred that it would be very difficult to meet the criteria without making many compromises. [40] . These characteristics give sludge an acceptable sedimentation rate and good compactness at the laboratory scale.…”
Section: -5graphical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the increasing of the current density from 30 to 40 mA/cm 2 was given an insignificant increase in the ions removal (from 95.5% to 96.2%), accordingly, 30 mA/cm 2 was selected as a best current density. The reason for this is due to the electrical energy consumption was concerning with the square rate of the current density (Lee & Gagnon 2016).…”
Section: Effect Of Current Densitymentioning
confidence: 99%