2021
DOI: 10.1007/s11056-021-09852-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Growth, biomass and nutrient stock in mixed-species planting of hybrid Eucalyptus urograndis and Acacia mearnsii in Southern Brazil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present study, the average proportion of the wood component was 75.4% and the average proportion of leaves was 7.3%; by contrast, the authors of [31] evaluated the biomass production in E. grandis × E. urophylla trees at 9 years of age and found a total biomass of 170.6 Mg ha −1 , of which 2.8, 5.7, 16.7, and 145.5 Mg ha −1 were accounted for by the leaf, branch, stembark, and stemwood components, representing 1.6, 3.3, 9.8, and 85.2%, respectively. The authors of [32] studied biomass production and found contributions of 89.3, 6.2, 3.2, and 1.2% for the stemwood, stembark, branches, and leaves, respectively.…”
Section: Forest Biomasscontrasting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the present study, the average proportion of the wood component was 75.4% and the average proportion of leaves was 7.3%; by contrast, the authors of [31] evaluated the biomass production in E. grandis × E. urophylla trees at 9 years of age and found a total biomass of 170.6 Mg ha −1 , of which 2.8, 5.7, 16.7, and 145.5 Mg ha −1 were accounted for by the leaf, branch, stembark, and stemwood components, representing 1.6, 3.3, 9.8, and 85.2%, respectively. The authors of [32] studied biomass production and found contributions of 89.3, 6.2, 3.2, and 1.2% for the stemwood, stembark, branches, and leaves, respectively.…”
Section: Forest Biomasscontrasting
confidence: 91%
“…In general, the leaf component had the highest concentration of nutrients, and the wood component had the lowest. This same behavior, with a higher concentration of nutrients in the leaves, was found by the authors of [30] in different genotypes and species of 4.5-year-old stands in Alegrete, southern Brazil; by the authors of [35] in stands of different genotypes in São Gabriel, southern Brazil; and by the authors of [31] when evaluating pure and mixed stands of E. grandis × E. urophylla and A. mearnsii trees of 9 years of age in southern Brazil. According to [36], the concentration gradient is as follows: leaves > stembark > branches > stemwood.…”
Section: Nutrient Concentrationsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…For earthworm and springtail, the EEC was the maximum leaf concentrations in their diet: 53.76 μg/g for Cry1Ab, 8.33 μg/g for Cry1Bb, and 9.73 μg/g for Cry2Aa. For D. magna , we utilized an estimate of the eucalyptus biomass from Ludvichak et al (2022) as a highly conservative scenario. This approach aligns with the pond model based on maize ( Carstens et al, 2012 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To conservatively estimate the EEC for D. magna , a model was used that assumed the living tissue biomass from 10 ha of transgenic eucalyptus drains into a 20,000-cubic meter pond ( Carstens et al, 2012 ). The amount of the living tissue biomass per hectare of eucalyptus was set to 25,200 kg based on published data ( Ludvichak et al, 2022 ). The EEC was calculated by taking 10 ha of the biomass at 25,200 kg/ha, multiplying it by the maximum measured concentration of each protein in the tissues of the event 1521K059, and dividing it by the 20 million-liter pond volume.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%