2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.icesjms.2004.01.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Growth, maturation, and longevity of maturation cohorts of Norwegian spring-spawning herring

Abstract: In 1907, the Bergen Institute of Marine Research started regular sampling of scales and lengths from landings of mature Norwegian spring-spawning herring. The actual age of each fish when caught was recorded, and from the early 1920s also the age at which it spawned for the first time. The present analyses concern biological samples secured during the fishing seasons 1940–1964. Herring in this stock do not all reach maturity at the same age. A small proportion of any one year class matures at 3 years. The majo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
40
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Distinguishing mortality prior to and following maturity acknowledges, and allows for the inclusion of, a survival cost of reproduction (Beverton et al 1994;Roff 2002). Survival from birth to age 3 was quantified from abundance estimates of northern cod (Lilly et al 2001) and from age-specific fecundities, as described below, such that survival from birth to age 3 in year t, l 3(t) , was assumed to be a function of the number, n, of 7-to 11-year-olds in year t -3 multiplied by the average fecundity of those individuals such that Survival from birth to age 3 estimated in this manner for the 1962 through the 1988 year-classes of northern cod was weakly density dependent (see Myers et al 1995) and averaged 1.13 × 10 -6 ± 1.11 × 10 -6 (±SD).…”
Section: Age-specific Survival L X and Survival Costs Of Reproductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Distinguishing mortality prior to and following maturity acknowledges, and allows for the inclusion of, a survival cost of reproduction (Beverton et al 1994;Roff 2002). Survival from birth to age 3 was quantified from abundance estimates of northern cod (Lilly et al 2001) and from age-specific fecundities, as described below, such that survival from birth to age 3 in year t, l 3(t) , was assumed to be a function of the number, n, of 7-to 11-year-olds in year t -3 multiplied by the average fecundity of those individuals such that Survival from birth to age 3 estimated in this manner for the 1962 through the 1988 year-classes of northern cod was weakly density dependent (see Myers et al 1995) and averaged 1.13 × 10 -6 ± 1.11 × 10 -6 (±SD).…”
Section: Age-specific Survival L X and Survival Costs Of Reproductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By examining prereproductive growth during periods of life history change, I am then able to evaluate the degree to which these changes can be explained solely as phenotypic responses to reductions in density. The influence of earlier maturity and smaller size at maturity on Atlantic cod population growth, and thus rate of recovery, is then assessed by a stochastic, age-structured life history model that allows survival costs of reproduction to increase with declining age at maturity (Beverton et al 1994) and incorporates reduced hatching success among first-time spawners (Trippel 1998). This use of a stochastic model builds upon work pioneered by Lewontin and Cohen (1969), and extended by Roff (1974), who modelled the effects of random fluctuations in population growth rate on expectations of population size and probabilities of extinction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…that first spawned in the 105 same year (e.g. Beverton et al 2004). We previously tested the assumption that after maturation, herring return annually to the spawning areas (Engelhard and Heino 2005).…”
Section: Statistical Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, Beverton et al (2004) provided evidence that after about 8 spawnings, Norwegian spring-spawning herring suffer increased mortality through senescence; reliable ageing of very old herring is 190 moreover problematic. We therefore excluded any combinations of maturation cohort and 8 or more post-maturation years (n p > 7,y ).…”
Section: Data Selection Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generation time (t) is the crucial parameter in estimating GL. In our case, t = 2.35, whereas t = 5.25 for Atlantic herring (Larsson et al 2010) that have much greater longevity (~22 years) and older ages at maturity (3-9 years) (Beverton et al 2004) than the Japanese local herring (~8 and 2 years) (Kobayashi 1993). Our data show that the age at maturity of the Japanese local herring was 2 years (Table S1), and no fish older than 4 years were collected over the last decade.…”
Section: Population Genetics Analysesmentioning
confidence: 67%