1999
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0029(19991115)47:4<248::aid-jemt4>3.0.co;2-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Guide to the identification of interstitial cells of Cajal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
71
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 144 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 109 publications
1
71
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In any case, Cajal's studies formed the basis of intense discussions in subsequent studies at the light microscopy level in the Netherlands and elsewhere and the 'interstitial neurons" were thought to be pacemaker cells or connective tissue cells and named interstitial cells of Cajal (ICC) (see [5,6] for review). In the 1970s and 1980s, cells that were considered to correspond to the "interstitial neurons" discovered by Cajal were described using electron microscopy (EM) in the musculature of the intestinal tract of several mammals, fully defined at that level by FaussonePellegrini, Thuneberg and Rumessen [5,[7][8][9]. In this period, EM identified these cells as "myoid" cells and firmly disproved the neuronal nature previously attributed to them by Cajal.…”
mentioning
confidence: 77%
“…In any case, Cajal's studies formed the basis of intense discussions in subsequent studies at the light microscopy level in the Netherlands and elsewhere and the 'interstitial neurons" were thought to be pacemaker cells or connective tissue cells and named interstitial cells of Cajal (ICC) (see [5,6] for review). In the 1970s and 1980s, cells that were considered to correspond to the "interstitial neurons" discovered by Cajal were described using electron microscopy (EM) in the musculature of the intestinal tract of several mammals, fully defined at that level by FaussonePellegrini, Thuneberg and Rumessen [5,[7][8][9]. In this period, EM identified these cells as "myoid" cells and firmly disproved the neuronal nature previously attributed to them by Cajal.…”
mentioning
confidence: 77%
“…These cell types have been identified and characterized in many vertebrate model systems including the mouse, guinea pig, rat, dog, chick, and human (Faussone-Pellegrini and Thuneberg, 1999;Komuro, 1999;Sanders et al, 1999;Young, 1999). It is now widely understood that ICC play a vital role in regulating GI motility.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Identification of ICC in the GI tract may be accomplished using Kit as a selective and specific marker (Huizinga et al, 1995;Burns et al, 1997;Kluppel et al, 1998;Faussone-Pellegrini and Thuneberg, 1999;Komuro, 1999;He et al, 2000He et al, , 2001Lyford et al, 2002) The proto-oncogene c-kit is expressed by ICC located within the tunica muscularis of the GI tract of mice, guinea pigs, rats, dogs, and humans. Antibodies specific for this protein label ICC within GI tissues in several species, including humans, and have been widely utilized to both determine ICC cellular morphology, and to characterize sub-populations of ICC located in distinct layers of the muscular wall of the GI tract (Ward and Sanders, 1992;Ward et al, 1994;Burns et al, 1997;Ozaki et al, 2004;Komuro, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Before the availability of anti-c-kit antibodies, classical identification of ICC was based on their ultrastructural features, including the presence of numerous mitochondria and surface caveolae, large bundles of intermediate filaments, a moderately developed Golgi apparatus, rough and smooth ER, few ribosomes and close contacts with nerve varicosities and the formation of numerous gap junctions, both with each other and with SMCs. 25,26 The ultrastructure of ICs in guinea pig corpus cavernosum was revealed by TEM for the first time. They had many caveolae along the cell membrane, numerous mitochondria and dense bodies, and a few of rough endoplasmic reticulum and lysosomes in the cytoplasm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%