Guidelines for developing, translating, and validating a questionnaire in perioperative and pain medicine

Tsang, Siny; Royse, Colin; Terkawi, Abdullah Sulieman

doi:10.4103/sja.sja_203_17

Cited by 1,157 publications

(1,054 citation statements)

References 42 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

985

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The English version of the SEOH questionnaire (Appendix 1) was obtained from a previous publication 23 and translated according to the guidelines for cross-cultural adaptation. [24][25][26][27][28] The forward and backward translations were assessed and revised, for the concept of item equivalence between the original version and the Indonesian version, by an expert panel comprising a bilingual dentist and dental public health researcher, who were familiar with the SEOH questionnaire. The questionnaire was tested among adolescents aged between 12 and 13 years to determine the clarity of the consensus Indonesian version of the SEOH questionnaire to the Indonesian culture.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Cross‑cultural adaptation and psychometric properties of the Indonesia version of the self‐efficacy oral health questionnaire for adolescents

Rachmawati

Maharani

Oho

2019

Int J Paed Dentistry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Summary Background Self‐efficacy can be interpreted as a self‐belief that one has successfully committed to a specific situation or maintained a specific behaviour. Aim We aimed to test the reliability and validity of a cross‐cultural adaptation of the self‐efficacy oral health (SEOH) questionnaire in the Indonesian language among adolescents and to understand the diverse perspectives of oral health self‐efficacy related to gender. Design A cross‐cultural adaptation of the SEOH self‐administered questionnaire was completed followed by a dental caries examination. Sample size estimation suggested 341 adolescents aged 12‐13 years. Eleven junior high schools were clustered and randomly selected from six districts across Jakarta, Indonesia. Results The SEOH was reliable with interclass correlation and Cronbach's alpha values of 0.86 and 0.86, respectively. Significant results for the construct and discriminant validity analyses were observed. There was no significant difference in terms of the total score between males and females, but there was a significant difference in terms of the psychology control domain. Conclusions Our study results provide evidence supporting the reliability and validity of the Indonesian version of the SEOH questionnaire for adolescents across Indonesia.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Cross‑cultural adaptation and psychometric properties of the Indonesia version of the self‐efficacy oral health questionnaire for adolescents

Rachmawati

Maharani

Oho

2019

Int J Paed Dentistry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The questionnaire was translated into Arabic and back-translated to English to ensure the semantic equivalence of the Arabic version. 10 In order to remove any ambiguous items, the questionnaire was pilot-tested on 10 medical students and five of the participants of the full study. The reliability of all items in the second and third domains of the questionnaire was assessed using Cronbach's alpha (0.944).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Knowledge and Attitudes Towards Clinical Trial Participation in Oman: A cross-sectional study

Al-Lawati

Al-Baimani

Al-Zadjali

et al. 2018

Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives: Clinical trials are prospective studies on human subjects designed to answer various clinical questions. However, only a limited number of clinical trials have been conducted in Oman. This study aimed to assess the knowledge and attitudes of Omani patients and their relatives towards participating in clinical trials. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted between October 2015 and March 2016 among 174 patients and relatives attending the Haematology and Oncology Outpatient Clinics and Day Care Unit of the Sultan Qaboos University Hospital, Muscat, Oman. A self-administered questionnaire was designed to elicit participants' knowledge of and attitudes towards participation in clinical trials. Results: A total of 100 patients and relatives agreed to take part in the study (response rate: 57.5%). The male-to-female ratio was 1:1.2. Only 31.3% of the studied population knew what clinical trials were and only 6.5% had themselves previously participated in a clinical trial. The majority agreed or strongly agreed that they would participate in clinical trials related to their own condition (59.2%). Overall, 89.7% expected to be informed about potential clinical trials by their treating physicians. Conclusion: Omanis had a low level of knowledge of clinical trials and a very low rate of previous participation in such trials, despite a moderate level of interest. Patients should therefore be educated and informed of ongoing clinical trials in order to improve participation rates for clinical trials conducted in Oman. Keywords

show abstract

“…Based on findings in the literature, 50 participants should have been enough to assess the 7 × 7 questionnaire in people with FGID; however, the lack of preliminary sample size calculation could be considered a limitation of our work.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Clinical validation of the “7 × 7” questionnaire for patients with functional gastrointestinal disorders

Ивашкин

Шептулин

Шифрин

et al. 2018

J of Gastro and Hepatol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background and Aim Physicians use different scales and questionnaires to assess the severity of clinical symptoms in patients with functional gastrointestinal disorders. The current study aimed to validate the “7 × 7” questionnaire for assessment of severity of the symptoms as a tool for the efficacy of treatment of functional gastrointestinal disorders, using the Clinical Global Impressions scale as the reference standard. Methods Fifty inpatients aged from 18 to 64 with a confirmed diagnosis of irritable bowel syndrome (26 patients, 52%), functional dyspepsia (15 patients, 30%), or both (9 patients, 18%) were prospectively enrolled in the study. We used both the 7 × 7 questionnaire and the Clinical Global Impressions scale before and after 28 days of stable treatment. Results Our study revealed a significant correlation between the 7 × 7 questionnaire and the Clinical Global Impressions scale results in assessment of severity of the clinical symptoms and their dynamics during treatment. The 7 × 7 questionnaire showed sensitivity of 74.5% and specificity of 54.1% for evaluating patients with mild to severe disease and 66.6% and 76%, respectively, for evaluating patients with moderate to severe disease. The Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0.719. The intraclass correlation coefficient among participants in whom the condition remained the same was 0.973 (12 participants [24.5%]). Conclusions The 7 × 7 questionnaire is a convenient, sensitive, and reliable tool for assessing the severity of symptoms and treatment efficacy in people with functional gastrointestinal disorders.

show abstract

Guidelines for developing, translating, and validating a questionnaire in perioperative and pain medicine

Cited by 1,157 publications

References 42 publications

Cross‑cultural adaptation and psychometric properties of the Indonesia version of the self‐efficacy oral health questionnaire for adolescents

Cross‑cultural adaptation and psychometric properties of the Indonesia version of the self‐efficacy oral health questionnaire for adolescents

Knowledge and Attitudes Towards Clinical Trial Participation in Oman: A cross-sectional study

Clinical validation of the “7 × 7” questionnaire for patients with functional gastrointestinal disorders

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About