2016
DOI: 10.22564/rbgf.v34i2.799
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gully Cavity Identification Through Electrical Resistivity Tomography

Abstract: ABSTRACT. Chaotic urban expansion often leads to hazardous environmental consequences. The absense of rainwater outflow management, coupled with low cohesion in some terrains is a geotechnical threat for the population since it may lead to gully formation...Keywords: piping, geophysics, electrical resistivity, electrical resistivity tomography. RESUMO. A expansão urbana desordenada pode gerar graves consequências ao ambiente. A falta de planejamento no escoamento de águas pluviais, aliado à baixa coesão de alg… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the lowest percentage of 11.4% was also obtained for soil sample collected at 41 m in Figure 9F with the highest estimated density and hydraulic conductivity obtained as 1,458 kg/m3 and 1.34 × 10 −2 m/s, respectively, with the lowest percentage of 5% silt and clay. It also validates the weak zones identified on the ERT model as yellow color and interpreted as sand and gravel with a resistivity value of 3,000 Ωm that suggests a permeable loose unconsolidated coarse grain material with a small amount of fine-grained particles (Shelton, 2005) that may be susceptible to soil liquefaction and piping (Carrazza et al, 2016). The particle-size distribution reveals two major types of soils which are coarse sand and sandy loam based on Wentworth (1922) classification.…”
Section: Geotechnical Interpretationsupporting
confidence: 68%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, the lowest percentage of 11.4% was also obtained for soil sample collected at 41 m in Figure 9F with the highest estimated density and hydraulic conductivity obtained as 1,458 kg/m3 and 1.34 × 10 −2 m/s, respectively, with the lowest percentage of 5% silt and clay. It also validates the weak zones identified on the ERT model as yellow color and interpreted as sand and gravel with a resistivity value of 3,000 Ωm that suggests a permeable loose unconsolidated coarse grain material with a small amount of fine-grained particles (Shelton, 2005) that may be susceptible to soil liquefaction and piping (Carrazza et al, 2016). The particle-size distribution reveals two major types of soils which are coarse sand and sandy loam based on Wentworth (1922) classification.…”
Section: Geotechnical Interpretationsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…Drainage path is a region where failure is initiated in slope because the water flowing through this path can initiate soil internal erosion referred to as soil pipe. Internal erosion such as piping has been responsible for most landslides occurring in the world as reported by several researchers (Carrazza et al, 2016;Okeke and Wang, 2016;Bernatek-Jakiel and Poesen, 2018). Resistivity values > 5,000 Ωm were interpreted as basement rock without cracks or openings.…”
Section: Discussion Electrical Resistivity Tomography Models Interprementioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous studies have implemented combinations of geophysical techniques including ERI and FEM for identification of near-surface features; these include an investigation on detecting cavities by Carrazza and Helene (2016) as well as another study into cave systems associated to urban hazards conducted by Lazzari et al (2010). Carrazza and Helene (2016) conducted a near surface geophysical investigation implementing ERI for the detection of cavities.…”
Section: Justification Of Geophysical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Carrazza and Helene (2016) conducted a near surface geophysical investigation implementing ERI for the detection of cavities. It was hypothesized that the piping phenomenon of soils generated these air-filled cavities related to material failure.…”
Section: Justification Of Geophysical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%