Gut oder unzureichend?

Löther, Andrea; Steinweg, Nina; Lipinsky, Anke; Meyer, Hannah

doi:10.37307/j.0945-5604.2021.03.10

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

The Change Theory Of Mentoring Programs Of Female Stem Students1

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2023

Publication Types

Select...

Article1

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent1

Authors

Journals

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Consequently, our evaluation approach considers that the causal effect of a mentoring program is neither linear nor monocausal. Rather, many different changes are needed to improve the decisions and successes of women in STEM professions (Löther et al 2021).…”

Section: The Change Theory Of Mentoring Programs Of Female Stem Studentsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Unlocking the Power of Mentoring: A Comprehensive Guide to Evaluating the Impact of STEM Mentorship Programs for Women

Wolf,

Brenning

2023

Social Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Although mentoring programs for female STEM students are often carried out with a great deal of passion on the part of program managers and mentors, robust results on their effects are often missing. However, regular evaluations are indispensable for an efficient allocation of resources towards gender balances in STEM. To accomplish this requirement, empirically valid and easy-to-use evaluation concepts are needed. We therefore develop an evaluation concept which corresponds to a Logic Chart, capturing three levels of expected effects (output—outcome—impact). On each level of impact, we derive a set of success indicators that can be measured by qualitative methods. A major advantage of our evaluation design is that the effect of a mentoring program can be observed directly after the end of the program. Furthermore, the results provide information about different channels of impact (e.g., reduced stereotypes or increased self-efficacy) and hence offer concrete indications for the further development of the program.

show abstract

Section: The Change Theory Of Mentoring Programs Of Female Stem Studentsmentioning

confidence: 99%