2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.baae.2007.01.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Habitat structure mediates top–down effects of spiders and ants on herbivores

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
28
0
4

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
28
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…It has long been noticed that, as the habitat complexity increased, more refuges can be used by herbivores, which leads to reduced prey capture rates (Crowder & Cooper 1982). For example, when plants were cut to a simplified structure, the top-down effect of ants and spiders on herbivores became weaker (Sanders, Nickel, Grutzner, & Platner 2008). Furthermore, the reward quality and quantity of plants for ants can vary with the size of the plant/branch (Miller 2014), which can lead to different ant-herbivore-plant interactions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has long been noticed that, as the habitat complexity increased, more refuges can be used by herbivores, which leads to reduced prey capture rates (Crowder & Cooper 1982). For example, when plants were cut to a simplified structure, the top-down effect of ants and spiders on herbivores became weaker (Sanders, Nickel, Grutzner, & Platner 2008). Furthermore, the reward quality and quantity of plants for ants can vary with the size of the plant/branch (Miller 2014), which can lead to different ant-herbivore-plant interactions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vegetation structure was, compared to plant species diversity or plant composition, a better variable to predict the distribution of the spider. As found by Sanders et al (2008), vegetation height negatively affected the presence of A. bruennichi. The importance of vegetation structure for spiders (McNett and Rypstra 2000;Rypstra and Carter 1995) as well as for arthropods in general (e.g., Perner et al 2005) is well supported.…”
Section: Bottom-up Effectsmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Species abundance in local communities is the result of a combination of bottom-up and top-down forces, however studies considering both effects simultaneously are much rarer than those focussing on a single direction (Walker and Jones 2001). For example, spider abundance is often seen as bottom-up regulated by prey availability (e.g., Greenstone 1984;Halaj, Ross, & Moldenke 1998;Harwood, Sunderland, & Symondson 2001), or in the specific case of web-building spiders by the physical structure of the vegetation (Halaj et al 1998;McNett and Rypstra 2000;Pearson 2009;Rypstra and Carter 1995;Sanders, Nickel, Grutzner, & Platner 2008;Topping and Lövei 1997). Spiders are also preyed upon by a variety of natural enemies (Foelix 2010), but surprisingly the contribution of top-down processes to their regulation has rarely been assessed (e.g., Askenmo, von Broemssen, Eckman, & Jansson 1977;Spiller and Schoener 1994).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This effect is also observed in their natural enemies (Halaj et al, 2000a, b;Ribas et al, 2003;Sperber et al, 2004;Sanders et al, 2008), even though some studies have failed to find this relationship (Riihimaki et al, 2005;Vehvilainen et al, 2008). Conversely, even though the diversity of natural enemies increase, large plants can provide herbivores with more enemy-free space due to their size and architectural complexity (Lawton, 1983;Jeffries and Lawton, 1984;Heisswolf et al, 2005;Obermaier et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Several studies have shown a positive relationship between the structural complexity of vegetation and diversity of predators (Halaj et al, 2000a, b;Klein et al, 2002;Ribas et al, 2003;Souza 2007;Sanders et al, 2008). Souza and Martins (2005) in a study using artificial branches concluded that the architecture of the branches is the most important factor that determines the abundance of spiders associated with plants.…”
Section: Response Variablementioning
confidence: 99%